this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026
830 points (99.8% liked)

memes

20999 readers
1890 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 43 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I imagine No Man's Sky is doing this specifically to reference the trope as was originally commonly portrayed in e.g. Flash Gordon serials and various golden age comics. Similar to Starbound, this also has an intentional gameplay implication in that it forces you to leave the planet and find another one with the biome appropriate for whatever resource it is you need. Otherwise you could park your butt on one planet and never have any compelling reason to go anywhere else which really rather defeats the intent of the game.

As far as other works of fiction go, though, yes. It's just lazy.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 3 points 10 hours ago

It can be relatively justified for NMS too, considering that its setting seems to explicitly be some sort of simulation in-universe, the rules it operates on don't have to match physical reality

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 21 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

No man’s sky also did it because of lazy. People may have forgotten, but that game released as pure hot garbage and only got better after tons of updates.

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Nonsense, those of us who weren't plugged into gaming journos 24/7 enjoyed it on release. I couldn't have cared less that it didn't have multiplayer or whatever. I wasn't even aware of any controversy at the time.

There aren't that many first person space exploration games outside of nms and elite and nms is much easier to get into. It was fun, and still is

And I don't count starfield because starfield is just a loading screen simulator

[–] TheSporkBomber@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Being a hot mess and being enjoyable are not mutually exclusive. 1.0 was a buggy mess with worlds that had the depth of a puddle populated by Mr potato head animals, the same half dozen outposts, and a suit screaming LIFE SUPPORT FALLING the moment you stepped out of the ship.

Doesn't mean it wasn't enjoyed by some.

[–] LostCarcosan@lemmy.today 1 points 12 hours ago

That's not true of it now? I love No Man's Sky, and have since launch, but still, it only takes about 10 minutes to see everything there is on one planet