this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
893 points (99.8% liked)

Technology

84019 readers
3316 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
893
Nintendo sued by players who say they should get any tariff refunds received by the US government (www.gamefile.news)
submitted 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) by Deep@mander.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world
127 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Two gamers have filed a class action lawsuit against Nintendo, alleging that the company will be unjustly enriching itself with any refund it secures from the U.S. government over widespread tariffs last year that, among other things, hiked the prices of Nintendo hardware and accessories.

“Unless restrained by this Court, Nintendo stands to recover the same tariff payments twice—once from consumers through higher prices and again from the federal government through tariff refunds, including interest paid by the government on those funds,” the suit states.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 60 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Friendly reminder that the Boston Tea Party was about tariffs. We know what works.

[–] VeloRama@feddit.org 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

not sure if this also works for self-imposed tarrifs.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They're not "self-imposed" if they're illegally imposed by a tyrant.

[–] VeloRama@feddit.org 2 points 4 hours ago

they are if you voted the tyrant into power

[–] TheRiskiestBiscuit@reddthat.com 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I would eat the cost of gas to watch people yeeting their Switch 2’s into the harbor. Boston or Baltimore this time around?

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 23 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

No no no. You don’t yeet devices into the harbor that have been paid for already. You yeet unsold devices.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Exactly. The tea was sitting in the harbor because it hadn’t been sold yet. The toilet paper warehouse fire was analogous to the Boston tea party, and they’re threatening the dude with the death penalty for it.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

Wait really? They do understand doing so will make him a martyr and make this a million times worse for them right?

[–] DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com 4 points 7 hours ago

Lmao, what? The fucking death penalty? This shit is so backwards man.

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago

Right. The tea wasn't from their homes

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 6 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Imagine what gon' happen when you try to tax our whisky.

[–] ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 15 hours ago

Imagine... Or just read how that went in 1794.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whiskey_Rebellion

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 5 points 16 hours ago

A rebellion? Because that didn't end so well.