this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
355 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

84019 readers
3320 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 13 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Time to carry portable EMPs

… uhhh how do I make one?

[–] MML@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

Get a disposable camera, it won't be large enough to do much but it's a fun little project and you can learn the concept

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (3 children)

You don't need a portable EMP.

All you need is basic KN95 mask and a hoodie. Or you can invest in sunglasses or ID-blocking eyeglasses, like IDGuard from Zenni. The point is to have your features covered as much as is feasible. When I go to a protest I wear a costume that covers my whole head and a jumpsuit.

You should have a KN95 on anyway if you're going out among people.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

Sure, but that won’t knock it out for people who don’t have their own mask

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

You should know facial recognition software is optimized to defeat KN95 masks specifically

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

What do you think what you posted even means? covering most of what it is using to identify is already going to make it drastically more difficult to match

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Not really. It’s trivial to match your face. If you use an iPhone with FaceID it won’t miss a beat. You have to cover your full face, head, and eyes.

The problem with this is that the idea of “KN95 and a hoodie” is that you’d still reasonably blend in. By the time you reach the point t of covering every identified part of your head, you’d also stick out like a sore thumb which doesn’t help you when the camera surveilling you is attached to the face of an ICE agent looking specifically in your direction.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Do you have a reliable link to show this? I'm asking not to challenge or sealion, but because I'd like to know the limits of what you're referring to for my own safety and privacy.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks. I think that's enough to see where you're going. It's on me to find better evidence, so I looked and it looks like a 2020 NIST report suggests masks increase the failure rate in 89 tested algorithms from 0.3% to 5-50%.

https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2020/07/nist-launches-studies-masks-effect-face-recognition-software

That failure rate is enough to give plausible deniability and reasonable doubt in a court, I'd wager. But I'm sure ICE sees a higher failure rate a feature since it likely gives them more pretexts to arrest. At least we know the technology isn't reliable enough to support it.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I mean court’s not really a factor. The surveillance tech is only to help identify targets. One they nab you that’s it. The Supreme Court already ruled that it’s ok for them to target people based only on race. The confidence level of the tech against your covered face is sorta irrelevant in this scenario.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Then wear a cloth one with a pattern on it.

This isn't difficult.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That won’t work either and it’s very difficult as a matter of fact.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Agreed that there's no perfect solution.

But one can, and should, make it harder, and if your head, eyes, and face are covered (which is exceedingly easy and inexpensive to do with a ball cap, sunglasses, and a face mask) it's going to beat all but the best systems.

[–] root@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

The IR blocking glasses won't help with normal CV though, right? If you wear those glasses and try to unlock your iPhone, it won't work because the IR array can't read the facial features behind the glasses, but if you take a photo of yourself with said iPhone, they will appear as normal glasses