this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
43 points (100.0% liked)

Anime

4449 readers
71 users here now

This community is the place to discuss and ask questions about anime, anime news, and related topics.

Currently airing show discussion threads are created by our resident bot, rikka@ani.social. If it doesn't make a thread for an episode that you want to discuss, see the user guide on the wiki for instructions on how to ask rikka to make a thread for you to use.

Check out our wiki to find:

Rules

More complete rules on the wiki.

Post Tags

Post tags are completely optional, but some recommended tags would include:

Related General Communities

Chat

Thanks to @NineSwords@ani.social for running the discord!


rikka

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 9 points 3 days ago

I've done some searches for plot synopses of a manga recently and somehow landed on one of these kinds of blogs, at least I think it is judging by machine translation.

What struck me about the blog I read was how little of the author's own voice is in it. It wasn't a review or critique of the manga, it was just a page-for-page transcription. The author had no editorial opinion at all, didn't even so much as say "good story" or "bad story." If there was any kind of analysis of the work at all, no matter how shallow, I would be more inclined to defend it.

"Spoiler article" is an interesting moniker, but I wonder how the conversation would go if they were re-framed as "wiki articles." Even mid-tier Wikia/Fandom wikis have about as much detail on character/plot pages as a "spoiler article" but they go one step further by having Analysis sections, Personality sections, lists of character relationships, etc. These sections rely on an author analyzing the work and writing something transformative or original about it. Can't say it necessarily would have saved them in court, but who knows.