this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2026
612 points (98.9% liked)

Facepalm

3615 readers
280 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Either way, it’s likely to backfire as people abandon ship for FOSS alternatives…

Legal entities will continue to use shitty proprietary software because of the liability. It's more important to have a legal backstop than actual security... It's security theater. It's a big part of why nothing is actually secure in USA. Casino griftonomics.

(I've been thinking about this in terms of the MIC too. Total failure against Iran. The iron dome lmao. They're pouring endless money into these grifters who almost never have to demonstrate quality/effectiveness.)

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 hours ago

That's stupid, especially when FOSS alternatives can be more secure. Liability culture is a scourge.