this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2026
24 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

60409 readers
212 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been selfhosting a while. I run around 15 distinct services in docker containers, all on a single machine with a medium sized disk. It's a small form factor, and I recently had to add space, so I've attached an external USB storage device.

It feels clunky.

At what point does a performant SAN/NAS make sense more than local storage? When did you make the jump?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

My NAS is in the case with my server (its just a desktop case with tons of drive slots). I'm not a fan of pre-built NAS as they're insanely expensive and can't be expanded without buying a whole other NAS. Plus now I don't have to worry about network issues causing my files to be unavailable nor tons of traffic over the LAN for reads/writes