this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2026
98 points (99.0% liked)

unions

3020 readers
24 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

So I’ve been thinking about this more, instead of a single store, what if they were to try to form a union of all Starbucks employees in the Seattle area? It’d be much harder for Starbucks to pull a “close the store and open a new one” play if it was for every Starbucks in an area.

[–] homes@piefed.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

While you have a good point, it might be kinda hard for Starbucks to shut down their first ever store, as it’s a sort of historic landmark for them.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

True, but I wouldn’t put it past them.

[–] homes@piefed.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

another good point

[–] themoken@startrek.website 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I've worked on unionizing businesses with multiple locations and the big issue is communication. Locations rarely have overlapping staff below the management level and chatting with coworkers, having rapport with them is key to building faith in any sort of collective action.

That said, Starbucks Workers United (mentioned in the article briefly) may be able to pull something off with a more regional scope, but AFAIK they focus on shops that are already working on unionizing rather than cold calling locations.