this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2026
1262 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

83858 readers
2885 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] teft@piefed.social 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You'd end up jamming yourself. You can't really have radars or other strong electromagnetic warfare devices near each other operating on the same frequency since they tend to interfere and wash out each other's signals.

As a decoy makes sense though since you can send them far away on a drone or something.

[–] KittyCat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can if they're all synced up together

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think this is just the wrong intuition. Not a faulty one, but one which is mostly the same as the doctrine which is being exposed as entirely ineffective.

US military doctrine is the "towards complexity" doctrine such that your opponent also needs to follow you into complexity. This worked for the US in the post WWII era because it was coupled with an exponentially increasing economic output.

Whats being show, as doctrine, is "away from complexity" and "towards distributed" approach to warfighting ends up being far more effective.

So coming from, practically, 100 years of "more advanced more complicated technology and approaches are better" being doctrine, its understandable to want to add complexity to systems.

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I can’t help but think this shift in doctrine could lead to the fall of an empire, with a new ideology in power rising from its ashes. We saw a very similar pattern during WWI, where changing doctrines led to an imperial collapse and paved the way for a new ideology taking power.

We might be on the verge of seeing history repeat itself.