this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2026
64 points (97.1% liked)

USA | United states of America

285 readers
1 users here now

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

This is so dumb, attacking Sam Altman makes AI look powerful and dangerous instead of just being a scam.

The alleged attack could add to heightened fears voiced earlier in the weekend by Altman, who wrote after Friday’s Molotov cocktail incident: “The fear and anxiety about AI is justified. We are in the process of witnessing the largest change to society in a long time, and perhaps ever.”

Nah dawg, we are not.

[–] potatopotato@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In fairness, I care less about why people [redacted] and more that people just succeed at [redacted]

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why? What would it accomplish?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's about sending a message.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

That kinda undercuts the grandparent commenter not caring about the reason, though. If you're sending a message, it matters what the message says.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

What message do you think it would send?

Sam Altman is full of shit, violently attacking him distracts from that and hands him an easy narrative to defend his actions with.

It is counterproductive.

[–] smokin_shinobi@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That we are all sick of billionaires bullshit. I’ll celebrate dragon slayers.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Hurting or killing Altman will lead to a more authoritarian, brutal crackdown and consolidation of power in the ruling class, it can lead nowhere else.

The only message you would send is it is ok for those in power to begin more openly smashing our society to pieces in the interests of keeping "everyone" safe.

[–] smokin_shinobi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are a lot more of us than them.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 week ago

Yes and there are WAY less of us when we resort to violence and intimidation because it fractures our clarity of intention and empowers the narratives of our enemies.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

That authoritarian crackdown will lead to an even larger anti-auth response. The reality is that the anti-auths can see and raise any authoritarian escalation, just like France did ~250 years ago.

The ruling class needs to figure out how to step back from the precipice, and fast. Bread and circuses incoming.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If he gets Kirk’d what narrative is there for him to share?

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Were you not paying attention to how Kirk was "martyred" by the mainstream media?

Did you not see how who Charlie Kirk was before he was killed become merely an uncomfortable detail to a rousing story of tragedy after he was killed?

Charlie Kirk's ideas will NEVER be challenged, lampooned and dismantled fairly because his ideas are overshadowed by the narrative of his murder. If a leftist shot someone like Kirk it would be the beginning of a brutal implosion of civil liberties that would make what has happened so far look relatively limited in comparison.

[–] Walk_blesseD@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are you joking??? The mainstream media tried turning him into a martyr, sure, but to what end? Abject failure. Like, c'mon, name one person who has taken his ideas more seriously since his neck just did that. I'll wait.
His lifetime dedication to making the world a worse place was put to an abrupt end, and his entire legacy of cruelty has become nothing more than a joke, with his name now a mere punchline.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

Charlie Kirk became a far more accepted figure after his death, killing him made the rightwing movement stronger, that really isn't up for debate the effect is so obvious.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe it's staged. I mean how much would cost to pay some people to do this. Notice how no real damage is done and no ones hurt. If that his response then I think he set this up to boost his scam.

Now if someone can prove me wrong by getting it right then I conceed they are real. At this moment I think its all bullshit. No way average person could get that close to his home.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean whether he staged it or not, all cult leaders are dependent upon producing a near militant zeal in their followers and that is bound to create people at the periphery of the cult who believe you are powerful and still buy into the fantasy of your power but no longer believe in you and believe they must stop you.

[–] what@beehaw.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're telling me that a scam cannot be powerful & dangerous, and that AI cannot be powerful & dangerous. But they are 2 powerful and dangerous things...

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

AI is not that powerful, this is all a scam.

[–] what@beehaw.org 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your opinion not mine

Can AI be powerful? Yes, students use it to write essays, programmers use it to write code, Googles uses it to find oil, the examples are plenty