this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
12 points (87.5% liked)

Doctor Who Social Club

406 readers
25 users here now

A community for discussing all things Doctor Who.


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to longtime fans feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. Spoiler protection will not be granted to information that is out in the mainstream media.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the DW franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
12-07 TWB 1x01 "Homo Aqua"
12-07 TWB 1x02 "Plastic Apocalypse"
12-14 TWB 1x03 "The Deep"
12-14 TWB 1x04 "The Witch of the Waterfall"
12-21 TWB 1x05 "The End of the War"

Doctor Who Wiki

---___

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The BBC is planning to cut approximately 2,000 jobs over the next two years. Does that add pressure to find a Doctor Who production partner?

<snip>

To add some perspective, the BBC had 21,508 employees in 2025 – the cuts would equate to losing one in every 10 employees across the multimedia company (and also the largest number of layoffs by the BBC in 15 years).

<snip>

We know that the BBC, BBC Studios, and Bad Wolf have gone on the record to reassure fans that the series isn't going anywhere, but does today's news of layoffs add more fuel to the fire when it comes to a new production partner? The previous debate was whether the show needed to have a big budget and big effects to succeed. Now, is it more about bringing on another producer to keep it at the level it was at when the show returned.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zabadoh@ani.social 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Dr Who prints money

But the BBC is a lot more programming and news than just Dr Who.

To understand why BBC is losing money, you have to understand that it's mostly funded by annoying "television license fees" paid by UK residents.

In the last 20+ years, the number of televisions and radios taxed by the UK government has decreased as more video and audio entertainment has moved to computers and mobile devices.

This is while living and production costs have risen.

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 1 points 5 hours ago

Yeah, I can't say I'm a big economics nerd, but there have been signs for years that the BBC has struggled financially. And although some prefer to see that in isolation from specific programmes (or just ignore it), it's clear with the shift toward co-productions that the license fees alone can't carry big costume or effects-laden productions.

Also, the relative freedom of production within a public funded broadcaster has given us the rich and weird Doctor Who lore that we have —and that's even disregarding the extended universe of Big Finish and novel ranges. I couldn't imagine quite the same emerging within a fully commercial framework... even though we are posting this to a startrek.website community 🙂