this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2026
658 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

84019 readers
3501 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] catlover@sh.itjust.works 58 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'd still be highly sceptical about pull requests with code created by llms. Personally what I noticed is that the author of such pr doesn't even read the code, and i have to go through all the slop

[–] kcuf@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ya I'm finding myself being the bad code generator at work as I'm scattered across so many things at the moment due to attrition and AI can do a lot of the boilerplate work, but it's such a time and energy sink to fully review what it generates and I've found basic things I missed that others catch and shows the sloppiness. I usually take pride in my code, but I have no attachment to what's generated and that's exposing issues with trying to scale out using this

[–] Repelle@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Same. There’s reduction in workforce, pressure to move faster, and no good way to do that without sloppiness. I have never been this down on the industry before; it was never great, but now it’s terrible.

[–] Danitos@reddthat.com 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Some thought I had the other day: LLM is supposed to make us more productive, say by 20%. Have you won a 20% pay rise since you adopted it? I haven't

[–] NotEasyBeingGreen@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago

Increases in productivity go to the owners, not the workers. Even imaginary increases in productivity.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev -2 points 1 week ago

Just fucking stop using it? Wtf? Tell you boss to pound sand! They're going to blame you when it goes south anyway so you might as well stay honest.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I suspect the answer will be that such large requested as you frequently see with LLM codegen will just be rejected.

Already I see changes broken up and suggested bit by bit, so I presume the same best practice applies.