this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2026
13 points (93.3% liked)
news
844 readers
890 users here now
A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.
Rules:
- Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
- Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
- Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
- Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
- No link shorteners
- No entire article in the post body
founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
14 years isn't "just started". And abusing animals at that age is a giant red flag. The US justice system will probably go overboard, but there should definitely be consequence for that behaviour at that age.
Sure
People at age of 14 cant yet legally consent to sex, yet you want them to have seriously severe consequences?
That's correct, I don't think someone two years away from driving a car should be given a free pass to torture animals.
See
Thats exactly why democracy sucks
That depends on jurisdiction. In Germany 14 is the age of consent as well as criminal liability.
Sure maybe some parent punishment, but you obviously have no idea how any criminal record, ESPECIALLY at that age affects their life FOREVER, do you?
Did I mention that its an animal?
Im not excusing it, Im just making sure you know the difference between a human and animal.
Then you should get a law that allows the striking of juvenile offences from the permanent record.
Yes, I assume he's getting charged with animal abuse and not assault, so that is already accounted for.
Thats ridicilous
We can kill animals however we like, and then eat them, but not hit them?
But you aren't allowed to kill animals however you like, there are a lot of laws that regulate how you're allowed to kill them. (Though, enforcement is often lacking.)
Exactly
Because nobody really cares, and animals dont have souls, they were created to reproduce and be consumed by humans
Its inhumane to abuse animals, but I dont think it should be punishable by law, and especially not on paper like a record
And maybe, just maybe it was him releasing steam which is better on an animal than human
Well, neither do humans, but we care about those for the most part. Also many people care quite a lot about their pets.
Well, I very much think it should be. Guess we just disagree on that point. Though I do agree there should be a mechanism to clear juvenile records of people are rehabilitated/don't re-offend.
Well, maybe next time he should try a tree or something.
I guess we dont wanna live the same, and why should we? :)
I am religious and for me only humans have souls.
By the way, isnt a baby alligator also dangerous?
Not sure, but looking at some images they seem pretty small and toothless, so probably not a major threat to a teenage human.
I tried the link, but its not working for me