Artificial Ignorance

301 readers

1 users here now

In this community we share the best (worst?) examples of Artificial "Intelligence" being completely moronic. Did an AI give you the totally wrong answer and then in the same sentence contradict itself? Did it misquote a Wikipedia article with the exact wrong answer? Maybe it completely misinterpreted your image prompt and "created" something ridiculous.

Post your screenshots here, ideally showing the prompt and the epic stupidity.

Let's keep it light and fun, and embarrass the hell out of these Artificial Ignoramuses.

All languages welcome, but an English explanation would be appreciated to keep a common method of communication. Maybe use AI to do the translation for you...

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca

It’s Called Silicon Sampling, and It’s Going to Ruin Public Opinion Polling (dnyuz.com)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by streetfestival@lemmy.ca to c/ArtificialIgnorance@lemmy.ca

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A recent Axios story on maternal health policy referenced “findings” that a majority of people trusted their doctors and nurses. On the surface, there’s nothing unusual about that. What wasn’t originally mentioned, however, was that these findings were made up.

The practice ['AI' start-up] Aaru used is called silicon sampling, and it’s suddenly everywhere. The idea behind silicon sampling is simple and tantalizing. Because large language models can generate responses that emulate human answers, polling companies see an opportunity to use A.I. agents to simulate survey responses at a small fraction of the cost and time required for traditional polling.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Also, sadly, if people will trust random Tweets or Instragram pics (or Lemmy posts), I find it hard to believe this will get them to reject polling.

Information hygiene is in the toilet these days.