this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2026
208 points (98.6% liked)

World News

55313 readers
1897 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Although Iran does not border the Bab al-Mandeb Strait, Yemen does, and Iran is closely allied with the Houthis, the Yemeni militant group that previously conducted dozens of strikes against Israel-linked vessels in the Red Sea in 2023 and 2024 in response to the war in Gaza.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

what else happened about then.....

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (3 children)

And what happened before that? And before that? And before that? This is how all these discussions go. But you blame Israel for not "cozing up" to a regime that literally does not recognize their legitimacy and has done so for 50 years while it has also funded terror groups to attack them.

I'm sorry but there is not black and white here.

[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works 1 points 58 minutes ago* (last edited 57 minutes ago)

Israel has a long history of funding terrorism as well. In the 1950s, Zionists secretly performed terrorist attacks on Jewish synagogues and communities around the middle east. This was done in an effort to make them feel unsafe in Arab countries to promote migrations to the newly-formed country of Israel. Before this, Jewish people largely lived at peace alongside Muslims, as they were traditionally considered "People of the Book" due to their shared Abrahamic-religious background.

Furthermore, Netanyahu's government has a history of funding Hamas to prevent the more moderate Palestinian Authority from representing Palestinians. Up until Oct. 7, Netanyahu was funneling 35 million dollars a month to Hamas through Qatar, with over 1 billion dollars transferred in total. He would do anything to prevent a two-state solution, and was also desperate for a distraction from his 10-year long corruption investigation.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 5 points 5 hours ago

Iran is right not to recognize the legitimacy of the Israeli state, because it was recently created via a violent settler-colonial occupation culminating in a genocide. It's not black and white, but it isn't completely fucking gray either, and there are some parts of this that are black and white.

From the American Declaration of Independence:

We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness—-That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Israel de facto governs the Palestinian people without their consent, depriving them of all rights and treating them as disposable. In this case where Israel has refused all attempts of the Palestinians to alter this arrangement the only path that remains to them is to abolish the Israeli state, as is their right. Israel does not have a right to exist and no other state does either. The existence of any state is a privilege derived from the consent of the governed.

[–] wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Your right, there's tons of historical context here.

You act like this attitude twords the US and its allies are in a vacuum.

You act like Israel doesn't have nukes treating them as well, funding terror in the region themselves. Gaza and Lebanon come to mind.

Why should Iran cozy up to such a hostile nation?

They're not. There rooted in the blood spilled by those same countries.

If the US is hated, it's probably justified.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

If the US is hated, it’s probably justified.

I'm not saying it isn't. I'm saying, and did say, not to lionize Iran just because you're mad at Israel and the US.

[–] wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I can be mad at both, and still believe Iran is in the right to defend itself from American and Israeli imperialism first.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works -1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I can't support any state that has supported terrorism the way Iran has. There is no justification for that.

[–] wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

What about the american terrorism? Glossing over that?

What I'm pointing out here,

Is that Americans and Israels have been the terrorist for decades in that region. Assisinating generals they feel like, bombing schools, developing nukes, the list goes on so much more than Iran and its proxies. So o don't understand how you can primailry denounce the little guy, at the expense of the angry shark in the room.

Because there likely wouldn't be as much terrorism, if not for the decades of antagonist behaviours.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

What about the american terrorism? Glossing over that?

Nope.

Because there likely wouldn’t be as much terrorism, if not for the decades of antagonist behaviours.

look what you made me do!

[–] Tolc@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

look what you made me do!

such a stupid gotcha, would hate holocaust survivor jews for hating all germans or not?

[–] wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Look at what you made me do

So you are saying the us shouldn't have launched the campaign? Because that sounds exactly like how your responding as well. They're all terrorists, look at what you made me do......

What makes Iran terorists and the us not one?

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works -1 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

So you are saying the us shouldn’t have launched the campaign?

Yes. I haven't said otherwise - y'all just assume I'm saying whatever the straw-man in your head has ready arguments for.

That said - terrorism is always the greater evil than military attacking military. You can justify war as "politics through other means" but when you start attacking non-combatant populations you're in a world of wrong. There is no justification for it. That was Iran's choice. That they fought back isn't (necessarily) wrong, but that they have chosen terrorism as their means is.

[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

This isn't military attacking military. The US and Israel are bombing schools, universities, water desalination plants, power plants, police stations, and other civilian targets, along with those who attempt to negotiate. This is terrorism, and there is no justification for it.

[–] wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 hours ago

You say that like the greatest terrorist organisation isnt the US military.

What I'm pushing agaisnt is who your letting define twrrosit, because to most west asia (and even east Asia), the terorista are the US military.

[–] Tolc@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago

so US cant be terrorist because it has military org? and bunch of peasants and farmers rising up against imperialism is terrorism? lol you are in deep amrikkkan