I'm aware benzene and other byproducts of combustion should increase lung cancer risk, but a wide swathe of studies has failed to ever conclusively establish a connection between cannabis smoke and cancer.

(Also cannabis in California actually is labeled with a cancer risk... not due to smoking it, but due to the presence of the terpene Myrcene, which is why you'll find the warning even on edibles. Still, that's just California being California, as I understand it the warning is there simply because Myrcene has a benzene ring in its chemical structure like many aromatic compounds do.)

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 1 points 3 hours ago

but a wide swathe of studies has failed to ever conclusively establish a connection between cannabis smoke and cancer.

The list of known carcinogens is quite short. That is mostly because it is difficult to conduct studies with a large enough sample to be sure that something is a carcinogen with high statistical reliability.

Given our current knowledge, it may be argued that eating fast food every day is not bad for you, as there are no conclusive studies linking it to increased death rates.

In the laboratory, most mutagenic compounds are labelled as mutagenic despite the fact that they are not known carcinogens.

[–] 0x0@infosec.pub 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Are you honestly asking for a source on inhaling smoke being bad for you?

Lay of that pipe mate

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 0 points 15 hours ago

Nothing then, got it