Not The Onion

21101 readers

350 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

739

Cedarville professor, author on Christian sexual ethics, arrested on eight sex felonies (roysreport.com)

submitted 2 days ago by spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

93 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A former Cedarville University finance professor whose writings promote a Christian ethic of marriage and sexuality was arrested Tuesday on eight sex-related felony charges involving one or more minors.

The indictment, filed March 27 in Ohio’s Greene County Common Pleas Court, charges John Kent Tarwater with two counts of rape, three counts of sexual battery and three counts of gross sexual imposition.

He was booked into Greene County jail in southwest Ohio, where he remained in custody as of Wednesday morning. No defense counsel was listed in public court records, and no hearing or trial dates were disclosed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Considering that religious offshoots typically occur because of disagreement in teachings and interpretation, no, they're not bound to their origins at all.

symbolic ritual cannibalism

Lmao, you're grasping at straws mate.

[–] whoxtank28@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

You are right and wrong.

Martin Luther had a problem with the idea of transubstantiation, but also rejected memorialism (the idea that you were taking the bread and wine to memorialize Christ's sacrifice). Martin argued that the literal body and blood of Christ were "in, with, and under" the sacraments. His reforms denied the magical transformation of transubstantiation, but vehemently defended the literal presence of Christs blood and flesh in the sacraments.

In other words, symbolic ritual cannibalism. Maybe some modern protestant offshoots disagree, but this is definitely not contained to catholocism.