this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
31 points (91.9% liked)
Programming
26489 readers
137 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
A code leak doesn't give a code and product use license. Any project and product use based on the leaked code is less stable and safe than other solid projects under clear terms. OpenCode is not obsolete.
What if you get Claude to implement a brand new codebase, using the leaked code as inspiration and then fix any slop issues?
This has already been done.
https://github.com/Kuberwastaken/claurst
They got one AI agent to read the code and output documentation (a specification) that contained no actual code.
Then they fed that to a second AI agent and asked it to implement that specification in Rust. Technically, this is a cleanroom implementation.
This is interesting from a legal perspective because it leverages the same legal loophole that Anthropic rely on for their own operations. They can't take down this repo without creating a precedent that will be used against them.