this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
182 points (97.9% liked)

World News

55254 readers
2518 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/61791919

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MrFinnbean@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

For one, most remotelly modern coal plants can be repurposed for single core nuclear reactors. So it effectivelly removes the biggest hurdle of nuclear. The upfront cost.

Another reason is that spend nuclear fuel is close to 96% recyclable.

Thirdly the energy production is steady.

Fourth and most important thing. We need to get rid of the fossil fuels right now. Its too important thing to dilly dally with. It does not matter if its solar, wind, hydro, thermal or nuclear energy.

[–] ExperiencedWinter@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Unfortunately, if I remember right, most coal power plants are more radioactive than the minimum we allow for nuclear plants. While we could convert them, right now I don't believe that is happening.

[–] Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Okay, I have never heard of using coal plants for nuclear and found nothing online. Do you have some sources for me?

And yes, I get the rest, but I would prefer to not use nuclear, but given the current development, I'd prefer going full nuclear over whatever the fuck a lot of countries are doing right now.

[–] MrFinnbean@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Its mostly because the process inherently is just boiling water with resource x and making steam engine go brrr. Coal plants have the infrastructure for the energy generating and logistics allready there and the parts are allready wistanding the heat. Additional bonus is that while coal plant needs weekly refills nuclear plant could produce the same energy with only few refills a year.

Here is pretty comprehensive recearch made in 2022 by DOE It takes account many benefits and hurdles if the process and its not trying to sugar coat it. (Sadly current USA political situation is not intrested pursuing this any further)

Here is good paper that studies the field wider but also aknowledges the potential in C2N conversion