this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2026
183 points (81.7% liked)

Political Memes

11506 readers
1362 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Picking a fight with Hasan Piker while midterms are gearing up is the dumbest fucking idea. The consultant class really is a problem when it comes to meaningful change. (TikTok screencap)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

voting blue no matter who got us here,

Well, no. Because Trump was elected. Twice. If people had "voted blue not matter who", we would have had Clinton, a shitty Dem and not a progressive, but NOT. TRUMP. And again with Harris, who would have been much better than TRUMP.

The time to fight and the place to fight is NOT the general US election, but everywhere else - primaries, and beyond.

But when it comes to the general election, the choice is FASCISM or NOT FASCISM for now, sot he choice is clear.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I used to agree, but now I don't. In the general election, the choice is between FASCISM NOW or FASCISM LATER.

Hard disagree. The reason for this mentality is Americans have this stupid fucking idea that one election fixes everything, and if we vote the once “correctly” we are done.

Fuck that. Vote blue blue no matter who means vote them to the left EVERY TIME! So next election isn’t about a fascist vs. bare minimum. You get the minimum and then work your ass off for a better challenger FROM THE LEFT for the next election.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] 4grams@awful.systems 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

D’oh, point remains, meant it to be in support of yours anyway so I’ll leave it :).

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I was mostly pointing it out because they didn't get notified of the reply that way, but they might come back to the thread and see they're WRONG. WRONG WRONG WRONG. hehe

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I’d fix it, but in truth I’m never arguing against the person, minds aren’t usually changed in online arguments. But a comment for someone else watching the conversation, is instead what I’m after.

That plus I’m really lazy.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

WRONG.

…just kidding. :) I do tend to get lost with my temper sometimes but it's only because I'm right and they're wrong, of course. :)

and I'm lazy, too, I hear ya. heh

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

I used to agree, but now I don't. In the general election, the choice is between FASCISM NOW or FASCISM LATER. We've been signalling to the democratic party that fascism later is fine for years now, and we need to start signalling to them that it's not.

Let's say Harris wins 2024. What would she do to prevent the next republican from being just as bad as, if not worse than, current Trump? Voting blue no matter who means never getting a progressive candidate. Why on earth would the democrats run a progressive when they can run a conservative, knowing you'll vote for anyone with a D next to their name?

Also... What primaries should we be fighting in when they don't have one?

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world -1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Voting blue no matter who means never getting a progressive candidate.

Voting blue in the general has absolutely zero to do with the nature of the candidate that got there.

Also… What primaries should we be fighting in when they don’t have one?

How about all the other fucking ones where they do? That ONE FUCKING TIME they didn't, and for arguably good reason, but who the fuck cares, let's say they tried to fuck us over that ONE SINGLE FUCKING TIME and because of that "Nope, can't vote blue ever again until there's a progressive"

NEWS FUCKING FLASH: There will never be a progressive if Republicans run shit. Because we're just about to lose our democracy.

The entire system needs to either be overthrown or taken over from bottom up. Neither of which has a fucking thing to do with voting in the general. I'm too fucking tired to come up with a good analogy at the moment, although I'm pretty sure you'll reject all of this out of hand anyway, but even if "both sides" are causing harm, one side causes harm a HELL of a lot worse and faster than the other side.

I'll take a fucking stab wound (not a slicing one, a puncture) over a gunshot wound or a grenade any fucking day, and I don't think it's THAT bad, although yeah, it's not fucking great.

I'd eat moldy food before eating literal shit with arsenic.

And I'd do what I can to not get into that fight in the first place (knife or gun), or not eat that food in the first place. But if I find myself with those two fucking choices, yes, I'll take the lesser harm every single fucking time.

Because while the fascists fucking play, in some states trans folks lost their IDs and I think they're trying to make them register? I've had some personal issues recently so I'm a little behind on some of the news. While the fascists fucking play, we're in war in Iran, invade Venezuela, attacks on various federal agencies that we DO like while getting other shitty agencies like ICE to kidnap, deport, and murder citizens.

So you support that shit, do you? Because if enough had voted for Harris, this shit would not be happening now.

The only way Democrats are worse is if people stop fighting for change if a Democrat is in charge and ignore the facists continuing to work.

Anyway, to make this not about you but to vent some steam before I go fucking sleep, FUCK this fucking nonsense that helps elect fascists. It's yet another way the fascists are trying to win. They want us divided on every front, and by ALL fucking means abuse their control over the media to make Dems sound worse than they are and give Repubs all the fucking passes. The average asshat not paying attention thinks both sides are about the same, but if you look at what they actually do, they are NOT. Most Dem politicians are center or centre-right, and that is STILL better than right-wing nutjobs. But we need to get progressives to run for office. It can happen - AOC get elected. If we had a fucking Congress of people like her, that'd be a good fucking start. But the way we get more like her is NOT to vote for fucking TRUMP or to refrain from voting. It's to get more progressives running for office. Discussing this shit online leads to protests, protests can lead to change if organized well. All of that is on the right path, even though online discussions and protests by themselves do little - and in the same way working toward getting progressives in control of the party would help solve things, but taking care of our oligarch problem is the real first fucking step.

But meanwhle. Voting in the fucking general for the fucking not-fascist option help keep things at bay better than putting more fascists in office.

Fuck this fucking timeline where we have to deal with this shit in the first place, but also have to fight to get people to understand WHY and HOW we have to fucking fight.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Voting blue in the general has absolutely zero to do with the nature of the candidate that got there.

It has to do with the nature of candidates that run next time.

How about all the other fucking ones where they do?

And when they stop having them altogether?

I'll take a fucking stab wound (not a slicing one, a puncture) over a gunshot wound or a grenade any fucking day, and I don't think it's THAT bad, although yeah, it's not fucking great.

We're not talking about choosing between one stab wound or one gunshot wound, this is a cycle. Would you rather get stabbed 10 times and shot twice, or shot once and then get a bulletproof vest?

So you support that shit, do you?

No, that's why I wanted someone who would throw Trump in prison and have him tried for treason. Biden seems to support it though, given his refusal to do those things. Also, Harris would have gotten us involved with Iran as well, since she's just as much a slave to Israel as any Republican.

I want you to imagine having this argument in like, 2040, when the choices are between a Republican who wants to send all trans people to death camps, and a Democrat who just wants to send all trans people to jail. I want you to imagine earnestly arguing in favor of a candidate who wants to send trans people to jail, because the alternative is sending them to death camps, and then I want you to flash back to 2026, and imagine how you can vote to ensure that that kind of argument never needs to happen.

Go ahead and vote Newsom '28, have absolutely nothing change with him in office, and enjoy the holocaust enacted by the republican who comes after him. Lord knows he won't do anything to mitigate it.

I'm done editing the comment now. It turns out I cared more than I thought

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world -2 points 9 hours ago

And when they stop having them altogether?

First, let me know when they do it a second time and we can maybe go from there.

Also, I'm done with this bullshit. Fascists appreciate your fucking support. I don't.