27
Australia will be left with no submarines if it abandons Aukus, senior defence official warns
(www.theguardian.com)
A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.
If you're posting anything related to:
If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:
Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
https://aussie.zone/communities
Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.
Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone
Surely the cost of just building our own (you know, just in case) is gonna be chump change compared to how much we paid for aukus anyway.
The Collins project taught us that building submarines is not trivial. And that was starting with another country's R&D (Sweden). We also have no clue how to make a nuclear submarine.
While there issues with the French Barracuda subs, I think we should have had an open conversation with the French instead of secretly entering into the AUKUS pact. The French do have nuclear tech, so using that as an excuse to change after we'd asked them to make us diesel subs is a bit rich. I don't know whether that'd have made nuclear subs, but I know it would have been something we could have asked about.
You're probably right. From what I remember most submarine-boffins/recommendations was to build diesel subs anyway - I'm sure if we offer the French some baguettes and a chance to annoy the British they'll still build us some subs.