this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
911 points (96.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

11198 readers
2346 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 12 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Sure, we'll all voluntarily surrender our paychecks, and starve. I'm sure MAGA will show empathy, and totally change their attitude, and won't just point and laugh at us as we starve, and scabs do our jobs for us.

I'd rather shut down the MAGA government for an extended period, deny them THEIR money, and hurt THEM. So the airports are out of control, who care? Almost everybody inconvenienced in an airport is upper middle class at the least. Most of them have money, and disproportionately vote MAGA.

So I'm sorry about the workers who get screwed, but I'm extremely happy to see people with money whining about missing their time on the slopes, or that big merger meeting that will unemploy thousands, or that AI training that will unemploy thousands, etc. Fuck them, make them wait for hours, as they ponder how voting MAGA has improved their lives.

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 17 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

If striking for 1 day means starving, then you got one more good reason for a general strike.

Best regards from Europe

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I was thinking about the airport stuff. Even that isn't what it may seem. For the upper middle class it is an inconvenience. But those below that who either fly for work, or to see family when they can afford it, it is much more than an inconvenience. So even that hits the "worker" harder.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

C'mon, it doesn't hit the average worker NEARLY as much as those with money, that's just common sense. It widely disproportionately hurts the middle rich. The truly wealthy have their own planes. It's the UPPER MANAGEMENT Class that gets hit, the bosses and C-Suite Sociopaths. Fuck them, let them stand in line at the airport while the rest of us relax at home. We'll either drive, or contact the other relatives by Facetime. That's what we all usually do, anyway.

This isn't the year for a visit. Don't like missing your grandchildren, Grandma? Maybe you should stop voting MAGA.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I meant more like to any specific individual. Not the group as a whole. The upper middle class person is just inconvinced. Someone of lesser means may not make it to see a dieing relative or what not.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Of course there will be the inconvenienced regular person, but airport inconvenience will hit higher income people to a far more disproportionate rate than the average person.

With any problem, even the best case scenario solution isn't going to please everybody, and that's too bad. The best way to handle that is to anticipate it, and be ready with a plan for those who are inconvenienced by the new solution. The worst thing to do is to abandon a good solution that helps the vast majority, because a few have an issue with it.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

I'm just saying the impact of inconvenience to 1000 people is about the same as the bigger impact people with less means feel of 100 people. So the total numbers can be skewed and still impact the rich less. I am not saying that is happening, just that it isn't cut and dry.

[–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org -1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Just pointing out, a general strike is not only self-inflicted. Per day it would cost the government far more than what a government shutdown does. We're talking about a factor of 70.

A government shutdown costs are an estimated 500 millions a day.

If we only shave of half of the daily GDP due to a general strike, we are talking about 38 billion.

You are right in saying it would hurt you as well, but a general strike is a lot more effective.

Edit: Btw, Americans daily shopping contributes only about a third of daily gdp.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

That number is ridiculous on the face of it. Perhaps the POTENTIAL is there, but the reality is that when people don't shop for a day, they just buy what they need the day before or after, so that number isn't real.

As for workplace impact, there's a bit, but just like shopping, whatever work needs to be done will be done after or before, and if you don't, you'll be fired. American workers have literally no job security protections. After a one day general strike, many Americans would find that they are the victims of a permanent Employer Strike. That's something that European workers simply don't understand. You won't get fired for a strike, but we DEFINITELY will. Many, many employers will fire EVERY worker who doesn't show up on strike day.

And this isn't all about the MONEY anyway, that's a particularly Capitalistic perspective. The current shutdown, which isn't even a full shutdown, is making them crazy, all day, every day. They are constantly asked about it by journalists, it is on every single news broadcast, and it clearly focuses the entire nation, and more importantly, the MAGA Government, on the problem. This shutdown isn't about money, it's about morality, and MAGA has a very difficult time defending themselves on the morality front.

[–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

We can agree to disagree. Just pointing out the facts.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 0 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

You are not agreeing to disagree.

You are calling them a liar.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

I wouldn't say they're calling me a liar, and they're not even wrong, it's just that the employment environment in Europe that makes General Strikes successful is far different than in America. They generally can't be fired for any reason at all. Unions are common, and powerful, even in lower level jobs like retail, and even the governments are worker friendly.

That's the exact opposite where any worker can be fired literally on a whim. Your boss hates your socks that day? After 20 years of loyal work, you're fired, get out. Seriously, that's totally legal.

OTOH, Europeans don't have a mechanism where they can literally shut down the government they hate. We do, and it works every time (if our elected representives have have a backbone).

What works over there, doesn't work here, and vice-versa. Criticizing Americans for not doing a General Strike is just as dumb as criticizing Europeans for not doing a Government Shutdown. We're going to use the tools that work in our specific Political-Economic Environments. Doesn't that make sense?

[–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks. At the end of the day I'm on your side and want the same thing, which is not having fascists at the helm of the United States. If that goal is achieved in a different way than I (or Europeans) would have done, that's okey.

Good luck and fortitude in your fight for democracy.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Thanks, we'll be okay eventually. We were raised on fables about Revolution against the most powerful military in the world. We don't tolerate tyranny in America. MAGA will never win. When it finally blows, it's gonna blow BIG.

[–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not. Just disagreeing with their take. Calm down.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 0 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Calm down? We're gunna circle back around to that.

But in what world is half of a percent of 500m a day equal to 38 billion? So not only are you incorrect in your turn of phrases, but you also don't understand math.

And I was calm, just pointing out that the phrase you used was incorrect. You so casually dropping that phrase is pretty fucking misogynistic, it really reads like a guy talking down to a woman. You should really work on that about yourself.

[–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 0 points 18 hours ago

A government shutdown costs are an estimated 500 millions a day.

If we only shave of half of the daily GDP due to a general strike, we are talking about 38 billion.

You misread. Those numbers are not connected. Daily gdp of the United States is roughly 77 billion. Half of that is 38 billion.