this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
1884 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

83695 readers
3413 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kabe@lemmy.world 106 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I also wonder whether or not grapheneos, or open source Linux OSs in general, will face any repercussions for failing to comply to these regulations due to the relatively low user count.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 110 points 2 weeks ago (47 children)

Hate to say it but systemd, the init system of most Linux distros, already has PRs with maintainer backing to implement DoB recording.

Some people can't kneel fast enough.

[–] portnull@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 65 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The self-important creator of Systemd has personally blocked that PR, if I'm hearing correctly, which would suggest he or his employer Microsoft is all in on it.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

It's an optional field in the userdb JSON object. It's not a policy engine, not an API for apps. We just define the field, so that it's standardized iff people want to store the date there, but it's entirely optional.

"I'm not picking a side" and "this future proofs standardization" is of little comfort, that is seriously suspect. I ought to look to alternatives to SystemD(odge the issue failed).

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So in other words, "Sure we built the people-crushing machines, but we didn't wire them up or turn them on."

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

IBM, is that you?

[–] portnull@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I was shocked it listed LMDE but it's a very old version (Linux Mint Debian Edition 2).

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Based on a Debian version for which long term support ended 6 years ago...

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 4 points 2 weeks ago

SystemDOGE. It is just a matter of time before Big Balls exfiltrates our Linux data.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 17 points 2 weeks ago

He left MS in January

[–] portnull@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

Ugh of course. Thanks for pointing that out

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago

That has already been closed

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe this'll take the shine off that wunderkinder mess and people will finally be free to choose something more reliable. I love how RH pushed this beta software so hard and my reboots are now just shite -- unreliable and occasionally ridiculously delayed.

I'll be glad to see the back of that metastatic shitball.

[–] yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

DoB recording, and ID age verification, are two different things though.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 21 points 2 weeks ago

My OS has never needed to know my DoB before. What's it gonna do, make me a cake?

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

No, they're the same in this context.

[–] tristan@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 3 points 2 weeks ago

Runit supremacy. Welcome to the void.

load more comments (42 replies)
[–] sphericalcube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 weeks ago

I imagine people behind this law are pretty interested in this small but powerful user base. I would just boldly assume that a lot of people responsible for independent software and privacy advocates are using Linux etc. So its a interesting user base for sure. But regulating open source software luckily is pretty much impossible and they wont give up their(our) privacy without a fight. Also, we will see how much the user base will grow when these regulations get tighter.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

They can simply say on their download pages that residents of Brazil and California are not allowed to use their OS.

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Motorola* bending the knee to the mass surveillance corps and international governments comes to mind. We'll see how their deal with GrapheneOS goes now.

I mean they can simply sell that phone with stock androud in californua and if users flash Graphene on it afterwards thats hardly motorolas fault

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Sure. Let them be sued on profits made 😂