this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
67 points (98.6% liked)
news
789 readers
855 users here now
A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.
Rules:
- Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
- Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
- Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
- Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
- No link shorteners
- No entire article in the post body
founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
He can easily overcome all of these attacks with a stroke of his pen come January. All he has to do is invoke Section 4 of the 25th Amendment on January 20th, and he'll easily become the longest serving president since FDR.
I don't get it?
Section 4 of the 25th Amendment describes how the VP and cabinet can remove Trump for incapacity. That section requires a 2/3 majority of Congress to confirm his incapacity. Vance will very likely be able to execute such a coup after the midterms. All these congress people who are attacking him now will be put in the position of supporting his coup come January, when the incoming Congress is seated.
Now Trump's out, Vance is a hero.
Section 1 of the 22nd Amendment establishes presidential term limits. It allows a VP who has been elevated to President to complete up to two years of their current term and remain eligible to be elected to two full terms themselves. So, after January 20th, Vance could finish out the last two years of Trump's term. He gets to run as the incumbent rather than the former VP, and he remains eligible for the following election as well. Ten years in the White House instead of the usual four to eight.
I thought it was the cabinet that voted to remove the president? Doesn't matter, it's not going to happen, everyone hates vance.
Initially, that is correct. Vance and a majority of the cabinet (Technically, the heads of the various executive departments, which are usually the appointed cabinet secretaries, but could be an undersecretary if the seat is vacant) send a written declaration of incapacity to the speaker of the house and the president pro tempore of the senate. Vance immediately assumes the role as acting president.
Trump then has two choices. He can step aside, in which case Vance continues as acting president. Or, at any time before the end of his term, he can send his own declaration that no such disability exists, and immediately resume the presidency.
If Trump declares no disability exists, Vance and the cabinet can (within 4 days) transmit a second declaration of incapacity, forcing Congress to decide the issue. If Vance sends that second declaration, he remains acting president while Congress makes its determination.
Since Congress will be in session in January, Congress has 21 days to decide whether the incapacity exists or not. (They get an extra two days if the notice was sent while Congress was not in session.) Vance then needs a 2/3 majority in each house to agree there is a disability to complete his coup.
Here’s a clear breakdown:
🔹 What it allows
It lets the vice president and a majority of the Cabinet declare that the president is “unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.”
🔹 What happens next
The vice president immediately becomes Acting President.
🔹 If the president disagrees
The president can send a written declaration saying they are fit.
They get their powers back unless the vice president and Cabinet challenge it again within 4 days.
🔹 If there’s a dispute
Congress must decide the issue.
They have 21 days to vote.
A 2/3 majority in both the House and Senate is required to keep the vice president as Acting President.
🔹 Key idea
Section 4 is essentially a constitutional backup plan for situations where a president is incapacitated (physically or mentally) but refuses to step down.
🔹 Has it ever been used?
No—Section 4 has never been fully invoked. Other parts of the 25th Amendment (like temporary transfers of power) have been used, but this involuntary removal mechanism has not.
If you want, I can walk through real-world scenarios where people have discussed using Section 4 (for example during recent presidencies) and what made it controversial.
I did not use chatgpt.