Privacy

4591 readers

606 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

submitted 2 months ago by Sunshine@piefed.ca to c/privacy@programming.dev

80 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Not to mention that they locked the unpopular pull request from reactions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, I expect them to stand up for the rights of users. Why don't you?

[–] mech@feddit.org -3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Adding an empty age column in a file that already contained one for your full address doesn't violate anyone's rights.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's complying in advance, when civil disobedience is called for.

The problem isn't the technical change itself; the problem is the motivation and context.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago

The premise for why it's being added however, subjectively does.

Which you know.

Also full address and name aren't mandatory, so it's not really a good comparison.

edit: I just realised i also replied to the same comment from you elsewhere in this thread.

[–] logging_strict@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

Rights? Why does the question of rights arise when discussing malware?

wtf! Everyone has an excuse for absolute everything and anything.