this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
149 points (98.1% liked)

Data is Beautiful

3650 readers
47 users here now

Be respectful

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] passenger@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] belazor@lemmy.zip 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

There is absolutely nothing of worth in that article.

First of all, the team size is irrelevant. Even if the maintainers all end up in plane crashes or whatever, all that would happen is packages would “revert” to core Arch when a newer version is released.

Secondly, Secure Boot is a Microsoft-controlled technology that is not FOSS, and should not be considered mandatory like the author implies.

Lastly, the author conveniently doesn’t offer any evidence as to what exactly about Cachy’s “culture” (whatever that means) encourages AUR usage. The only thing I can think of is the fact that an AUR helper is preinstalled.

Not a single claim that isn’t incorrect on its face actually has any sources backing it up.

Can you elaborate on which part of this article has more worth than your average AI slop article?

[–] ShaunKL@startrek.website 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Who is this person? Why does their opinion matter? Why are they writing about FOSS on a Billionaire’s Typewriter? Who is their audience? Why are they so concerned about recommending a corporate backed distros over a hobby distro made for hobby users?

The linked author also has account-gated articles such as The Senior Engineer’s Job in 2026 Is Code Review, Not Code Writing There is nothing in their About page and a cursory online search can’t confirm there’s a real person writing this blog.

Me personally, I use CachyOS on my gaming computer after bouncing from popOS to Fedora to Arch to Bazzite. Cachy provides a familiar foundation while more of my games work without issues, it provides nice quality of life Arch utilities, and gives me a mutable distro to tinker with when I need to.

Is it perfect for everyone? No. Is it going through a hype-cycle? Yes. If Cachy ends up becoming unstable or insecure on my system, can I switch? Easily.

It’s really weird to me to see a hot-dropped random blog post heavily upvoted with no discussion. Even if the blog matches the poster’s opinion, we should be careful in 2026 that we’re sharing genuine information with each other and not corporate propaganda or LLM slop posts.

[–] Brummbaer@pawb.social 4 points 23 hours ago

It's some kind of click-farming. That's a negative knowledge article, you feel less informed after reading it.

[–] passenger@sopuli.xyz 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I think you're overreacting.

I see CachyOS as useful for those overclocker types wanting to get that extra percent performance gain, for their gaming PC, but would not suggest it for the newcomer Linux user as a daily driver. I think this article has this kind of message. Choose CachyOS if you want potentially unstable but performance optimized state of the art OS.

Today we really can't be sure, and I hate all the AI slop articles, so I'm hoping this one isn't that. At least it convinced me that it has an expert behind it.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 1 points 10 hours ago

What is this reply even on about? The discussion is not even about nooby recommendations. Besides, I started my journey on Arch. The difficulty curve is overblown.

[–] sakphul@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks for posting this blog post. It was a very interesting read. Didn't know that CachyOS was using BTRFS with bootable snapshots like OpenSUSE does with snapper.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 1 points 1 hour ago

I have been using linux for a bit now and it works pretty well, except for the obvious stuff that just doesn't work. I wouldn't say i'm very knowledgeable, but also not a noob. But whenever i read stuff like your comment, i can't tell if people just make up words or if i should know more about linux

[–] gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This was a good read, thanks for posting. I'm on vanilla arch and I looked into switching to Cachy but the size of the team and the direct replacement of Arch specific packages stopped me. I don't know if I trust a small team, in already the niche OS of today, to maintain everything indefinitely and without issue.

This is one of those scenarios that id wish for those optimizations to come to trunk in a meaningful way than for a separate branch to exist.

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

I think the only reason to switch would be the optimizations, right? For new users, the installer is probably nice.

You can get all the optimizations they made in Arch, too. It's very easy to get their custom kernel, just install linux-cachyos from AUR.

For other system settings, see: https://github.com/CachyOS/CachyOS-Settings