Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
I think there's plenty of diversity. However there is a tendency on certain instances to completely dogpile anyone who has the Wrong Opinion on certain issues, with extreme hyperbole.
Take the AI thread going on. People keep referring to environmental costs as if using an AI query is the equivalent of burning down a whole tree. You consume way more energy just charging your phone. Watching a video. Playing games. Yet using an AI is bad enough to get you called a fascist, an eugenicist and other fun things. The lack of perspective is staggering but certain section of Lemmy users have just decided that AI is evil and any nuance is wrongthink. Even just accepting the reality that AI isn't going to go away is seen as evil comparable to murder.
Other example is the db0 blocking feddit.org debacle.
I'm also seeing a lot of reasonable, even-handed takes on AI getting upvoted in that thread, tbh. The most downvoted comment is one saying that "AI is fascism".
I think some people pay waaay too much attention to instances. I never pay attention to it and these groupings never surface for me. It’s all just Lemmy for me.
I'd buy into the potential for eventual advanced AI being potentially a very serious, existential threat to humanity.
But I'm not especially worried about AI in the near term. I'm pretty sure that a substantial chunk of people upset about present-day AI systems are worried about economic shifts from AI putting their job at risk one way or another, which is something that I don't agree much with
technological advancement has always caused changes in what people do. People in today's society in, say, the US, do almost entirely different things than they did two hundred years ago, for example. That change is nearly always considered to be a positive in retrospect. There are very, very few people in 2026 who are going to seriously say "everyone should drop what they are doing and society should go back to farming small farms with horses and oxen the way we did around 1800".
However, if you look at, say, the Luddites, we've had a history of people being worried about that change as it occurred, so I don't much think that people will stop. It's just human nature to fret about that sort of thing, I think. I'd be inclined to just let people have their say and move on. It's not that I agree with the people who are yelling about it, but that I don't realistically think that there's going to be a world where you have technological development and don't have people worried about how changes from that technological development might affect their place.
I also think that people who are worried about that are also a lot more likely to be vocal than people who aren't worried about it. I mean, only stands to reason
if there's something that you are really, really worried about, you're probably going to talk about it. If there's something that you don't see as a particular concern, then you're probably less likely to talk about it.