this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
29 points (100.0% liked)

Australian Politics

1767 readers
44 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Varoufakis argues global elites are following a “blueprint for the revival of fascism”, one he imagines dictators Mussolini, Hitler and Franco might have written “had [they] gotten together in 1945”.

He told the audience the modern “manual” starts by attacking crony capitalism, big business and financial elite — views traditionally associated with the political left – before turning against democratic institutions such as public broadcasters and universities.

https://thepoint.com.au/news/260312-varoufakis-fascism-is-darkening-our-doorsteps

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tomatosametomato@piefed.zip -4 points 5 days ago (3 children)

How is what's happennig today fashism? Why history bros think everything has happened already? Speed of information was never this fast... Todays problems are new actually, why can't they accept?

Before you say "hey it's a warning/analogy", the dude used the word blueprint. It's literal.

[–] eureka@aussie.zone 3 points 4 days ago

Fascism is a broader tent than, say, Italian Fascism or Nazism. But lets take an extreme example to first illustrate that the term 'fascism' is relevant today - there are organisations on our streets (e.g. the NSN) loudly and proudly attempting to revive the core aspects of those movements - so we should be calling these people neo-fascists (or, more loosely, fascists) even if conditions and tactics have changed significantly.

Fascism, even before WWII, was a nebulous term, even among themselves, and for various reasons it always will be, but some scholars have made useful characterisations, a notable one being Umberto Eco's "Ur-Fascism" listing general properties of fascism. And as we see neoliberalism, which is what's happening today and has been happening for decades, falling further and further into crisis, we've seen a consistent rise of movements resembling fascism, which co-mingle with self-proclaimed fascists. Look at One Nation and their links to the upper owning class (notably Gina Rinehart) and their heavy presence in the speaking list of the neo-Nazi "March for Australia" rallies. Whether or not we wish to nitpick about what exact moment such things become 'fascism', it's perfectly valid to look at this trend, its many shared characteristics, and say yes, fascism is on our doorstep.

What about, say, the present USA, do you think is important enough of a difference that we shouldn't group it together with early 1930s fascist movements?

[–] arbilp3@aussie.zone 3 points 4 days ago

It doesn't have to be exactly the same. The underlying elements repeat a pattern and manifest like a 'variation on a theme' whether with or without speed of information. I found this document that lists the elements of fascism. You may note that many of them are active today : https://www.keene.edu/academics/cchgs/resources/presentation-materials/characteristics-and-appeal-of-fascism/download/

[–] TheHolm@aussie.zone 2 points 4 days ago

Keeping in mind that average IQ start decreasing first time in history. It is not surprising that Nazi ideas are getting hold.