this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
728 points (98.7% liked)

World News

55008 readers
1789 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As speculation mounts that Kim Jong-un and Trump could meet this month, analysts say Pyongyang will continue to see nuclear weapons as a matter of survival

North Korea’s launch last week of a missile from a naval destroyer elicited an uncharacteristically prosaic analysis from the country’s leader, Kim Jong-un. The launch was proof, he said, that arming ships with nuclear weapons was “making satisfactory progress”.

But the test, and Kim’s mildly upbeat appraisal, were designed to reverberate well beyond the deck of the 5,000-tonne destroyer-class vessel the Choe Hyon – the biggest warship in the North Korean fleet.

His pointed reference to nuclear weapons was made as the US and Israel continued their air bombardment of Iran – a regime Donald Trump had warned, without offering evidence, was only weeks away from having a nuclear weapon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Weapony that the former USSR had claim to and would have been a justification for intervention. I'm not going to sit here and pretend I know the nuances of the fall of the USSR. I was 3. But I can see enough to know that at the time, Ukraine made the smart play for the foreseeable future. In 1994. In hindsight, it should have held its nukes. In the moment, throwing down that sword gave it a seat at the world table.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Weapony that the former USSR had claim to and would have been a justification for intervention.

Hate to break it to ya...

But after the dissolution of the USSR, there wasn't anymore USSR.

Russia had claim to those weapons, just like the nukes.

Ukraine kept the conventional equipment, and gave up the nukes back to Russia instead.

This isn't a hypothetical, this is what happened, and if you don't know what happened, it's hard to trust you on hypotheticals. Youre making them without all the facts

[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Look, I'm not really into how hot you're being about this. Little nitpicking like that doesn't strike me as good faith discussion. Especially when I haven't exactly been adverse to a few of your points. If you want to talk, cool, if you want to argue, scroll on.

Thank you.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

how hot you’re being about this

"It's only nuclear war, why is everyone getting all worked up!?"