this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
513 points (99.0% liked)

World News

54818 readers
2723 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

We do know that the US was targeting the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corp (IRGC), and the school is in an IRGC compound.

The most likely explanation seems to be that they intended to target an IRGC building, but instead hit the school. Whether that's an issue with the missile's guidance system, the plane's targeting system, outdated maps, or a flaw in whatever process the military is using to select targets, is unknown.

It's of course, possible that the US intentionally bombed a little girls school, but it seems somewhat unlikely. Even the most hawkish war mongerers recognize that randomly slaughtering hundreds of school girls is not going to gain support for your war.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Came here to say basically this. I read that it used to be on the compound, but that it was separated out by a wall and made into a school some time ago - long enough that it means (if it's true) we were using very outdated data, but you can apparently see on Google maps that it used to be part of the compound but now is outside the compound.

So a charitable interpretation is that we used outdated information to bomb what we thought was a military building. And of course there are less charitable interpretations.

[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The school was in the IRGC compound; however that was 10 years ago.

According to satellite imagery, the building in which the school was housed was initially walled within the IRGC compound in 2013 but was then walled off by September 2016.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Minab_school_airstrike (original source was paywalled)

[the school] had been separated from the military complex and had become a clearly defined civilian institution for more than 10 years.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/3/questions-over-minab-girls-school-strike-as-israel-us-deny-involvement

Currently, the most likely explanation was that AI was used to choose targets and it hallucinated the building being a military target based on old data. Also, the strike was not an accidental miss, because it involved a "double-tab" with a second missile used to kill those who came to provide aid after the first hit.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Well the military won't even acknowledge that a mistake was made so de facto they ARE perfectly fine with massacring children until proven otherwise.

They are now on par with their IDF brothers as far as I'm concerned.