this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
848 points (97.9% liked)

World News

54818 readers
2313 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Amberskin@europe.pub 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I did read it.

The action toke place half an ocean away from the combat theatre. There were no enemy naval nor aerial units around. There was no reasonable risk for the American sub.

But the captain decided not to help the survivors.

He is a war criminal and should be put on trial. But it won’t happen.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm sorry but you are wrong. The US have committed more than their fair share of war crimes. But this spcific incident isn't one of them.

You say you read it, but it would then seem you purposefully ignored this part

based on the circumstances and the information reasonably available

You can look back and say "oh, they never sent a jet, there was no danger". But you're doing that with the textbook in hand. You are sitting several days in the future with far more information available to you than at the time of the incident.

A submarine, and I honestly can't believe i have to say this more than 10 times by now. Is generally not equipped to conduct rescue operations. As far as the submarine captain goes. What do you want him, personally, to do, that also does not put his submarine or his crew in potential danger.