Aussie Enviro
An Australian community for everything from your backyard to beyond the black stump.
🐢
Topics may include Aussie plants and animals, environmental, farming, energy, and climate news and stories (mostly Aus specific), etc.
🐧 Want a news or information source? Try one of these links below!
News
The New Daily
(Life, Sci, Envt)
John Menadue
(Pub Pcy/Climate)
National Indigenous Times
(Envt)
Science
Online Library.Wiley
(Srch Earliest)
Conservation
Australian Conservation Foundation ACF
Biodiversity Council
(Stories)
WWF, World-Wide Fund for Nature
WWF, World-Wide Fund for Nature
(Blogs)
Nature Conservation Council for NSW
Queensland Conservation Council
(Blog)
Environmental Defenders Office
Education Institutions
University of the Sunshine Coast
University of Technology, Sydney
Queensland University of Technology
University of Southern Queensland
University of New England
(Connect)
University of Western Australia
Misc
Takvera (J,Englart)
(Climate Citizen Blog)
Australian Youth Climate Coalition
🐫
Trigger Warning: Community contains mostly bad environmental news (not by choice!). Community may also feature stories about animal agriculture and/or meat. Until tagging is available, please be aware and click accordingly.
🪲
Aussie Zone Rules.
- Golden rule - be nice. If you wouldn’t say it in front of your ~~grandmother~~ favourite tree, don’t post it.
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. You are allowed to denigrate invasive plants or animals.
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here. Except invasive plants or animals.
- No porn. Except photos of plants. Definitely not animals.
- No Ads / Spamming. Except for photos or stories about plants and animals.
- Nothing illegal in Australia. Like invasive plants or animals. Exotic microbes and invasive fungi also not welcome.
- Make post titles descriptive with no swear words. Comments are a free for all using the above rules as a guide. Fuck invasive plants and animals.
🐝
/c/Aussie Environment acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the land, sea and waters, of the area that we live and work on across Australia. We acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture and pay our respects to their Elders past and present.
view the rest of the comments
Don't worry, general physics means that this is just another investment scam.
I'll explain it out so you can get the general idea;
In order to reflect a sun's worth of sunlight, you need a reflective surface in low earth orbit that is somewhat larger than the angular size of the sun from our perspective on the ground. Imagine just using an ordinary mirror at home, you need to see the whole of the sun in it, and that works out to be about a little mirror about the size of your thumb at arm's length. In low earth orbit that mirror ends up being about 2km across.
To get that kind of reflective surface area in orbit you need about a couple of thousand 50 metre wide reflectors on satellites, just to reflect light to a single location with the rough equivalent of sunlight.
And then at the height of low earth orbit the earth eclipses the sun for quite a bit of time, so the sats that can see the sun during the night below on Earth are actually only able to do so for a couple of hours before sunrise or after sunset. So now you need to launch 10x more sats so that the sats that can see the sun can reflect light to where you want it.
So let's just say 20,000 sats to start with.
With some clever engineering, you could probably make them the same size as SpaceX sats, and they launch about 25 at a time for a customer cost of about 70 million USD.
My calculator says that the launch cost for this is 56 billion USD. And then sats in that orbit with huge, high drag panels will get pulled into the Earth's atmosphere after about 5 years, so you just need 56 billion up front plus about 10 billion a year to maintain the constellation, forever, and with all of that stuff flying around up there you can direct 1 suns worth of solar energy to 1 location.
Now you could take that array and split it up and provide, maybe a moonlight effect to a hundred places, and maybe, maybe, a hundred someones might pay the hundred million a year to feebly light their city streets or something. Seems a bit of an ask when there's plenty of ways already to turn night into day locally for a lot cheaper.
BUT - you could also repurpose those 20,000 sats to provide a dozen sun's worth of energy to any point on earth during the day when about half of them can easily see the sun.
This sure sounds like a practical equivalent of a death ray to me, which means all this bullshit will never get anywhere because no country in the world will allow anyone to build it.
So rest easy, this is just another way to scam venture capitalists and won't go much further than these press releases.
But if it means they'll still put up thousands of satellites, even if the light the mirrors reflect is feeble they will still be harming the Earth. Death ray? Perhaps this is exactly what they want. And since when does scamming ever put off the Epstein mob and their lackeys?
The idea isn't to replace the sun entirely. It's to generate 100% sunlight for 1% of the area, and change the orientation of the mirrors based on who pays a subscription.