this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
1155 points (99.1% liked)

Political Memes

11243 readers
2466 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1155
hmm (s3.us-west-000.backblazeb2.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AuroraZzz@lemmy.world 17 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I'm gonna agree with you. If OP gets audited, this will not hold up. OP cannot deduct money for a service that the charity pays nothing for. Only unreimbursed or out of pocket expenses can be deducted this way

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

If OP gets audited, this will not hold up.

The IRS actually already did look it over. They decided (rather arbitrarily) that the script I donated was worth ~50,000 instead of ~70,000 as I was trying to claim. Definitely not a full audit, but they already reviewed it at some level and it passed muster.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Right because you're donating intellectual property which is property. And that distinction is fucking nonsense but here we are. I doubt a full audit would allow market prices to survive on that though. They'd be like "hey now, this didn't cost you that." But to do a full audit we'd actually have to fund the IRS. Good luck getting that to happen.

[–] captcha_incorrect@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They’d be like “hey now, this didn’t cost you that.”

But would not that depend on how OP's time is valued in this case? OP could argue that their expertise costs $14000/hour ($70000 over 5 hours). I am sure that they would argue the hour cost, I have not clue how the IRS handles something like this.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

They don't let you deduct the cost of your own labor ever. The property thing is the loophole (but after further research not a real loophole and they will nail you for it).