this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2026
600 points (99.5% liked)

politics

28657 readers
2598 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 325 points 17 hours ago (10 children)

Normally this would end a Presidency within days of making remarks like that.

Nothing about this is normal.

Don't let them normalize this shit.

Join the next general strike or you'll be the next victim he can brag about or blame you for being a terrorist.

[–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 3 points 3 hours ago

Even black mirror author ran out of ideas, and the onion articles seems like ordinary life now.

[–] Carighan@piefed.world 5 points 6 hours ago

Yeah Trump has amiably shown what political commentators have said for decades, the US-system is too easily exploited by the executive concentrating power and removing the safeguards other countries have in their setups.

[–] totesmygoat@piefed.ca 44 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

He still had vets and current military vote for him. After. He called them suckers and losers.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 16 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

That info didn't make it into their NewsMax/Facebook filter bubble. Even if it did manage to slip through via a relative or a coworker, it would have been too late, "fake news" or about those other people.

[–] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 7 points 9 hours ago

Exactly. People really underestimate the conservative ~~news~~ bubble.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago

If you still support someone after they call you a sucker and loser, they might be right about you being a sucker....

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 54 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

One atrocity can dissolve a government. But one atrocity every day can keep even the most hated and incompetent leader in power for a long time. While we‘re busy processing what has happened yesterday he already committed another unforgivable crime. And it goes on and on and on. He simply overwhelms the people with atrocities to the point everyone fights their own battle and debates which of the many crimes is worse and needs to be addressed.

[–] null@lemmy.org 15 points 15 hours ago

That's been his style of political discourse forthis entire run. It's a neverending fountain of shit with some of it sticking to the wall.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 13 hours ago

The head of the snake, and whatnot...

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 65 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I'll join the general strike that lasts for more than a day

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 13 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, join the one that lasts a day, too.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 13 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

They shouldn’t call them that. It’s just a walk out. Maybe it’s OK to call it a dress rehearsal or practice run but the point would be to test community support mechanisms and get the word out, not to “put the corpos on notice” or lend virtue to someone’s extra personal day. The truth is it’s not much of a stress test if it’s just 1 day. Also it’s crying wolf. General strikes should damage the economy and an extra snow day just doesn’t. It fails that goal even if it feels nice to say they participated in a “general strike.”

But the more insidious problem is one of logistics, tactics, and reserves.

With protests, there’s often rotating participation so overall support/resource/attention burnout isn’t a brick wall issue. People generally know how many protest days they have to give up front and using them up just means they’ll need to be replaced by another protestor. The point is showing up if you can.

But “1-day general strikes” steal actual person-days from the real general strike (a protracted war of attrition between workers and the economy where the workers hurt themselves to hurt their enemy). Meaning, it actually helps corporations not just by dis-carding useable cards in our deck prematurely_and_ revealing to the opponent our possible hands, it also subtracts drawable cards from our reserves since each of those person-days eventually must be borne by mutual support networks later on.

“1-day General Strikes” are not general strikes!

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

People are strengthened by working together and organizing community action at any scale, not weakened.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 hours ago

No.

Organized community action that accomplishes nothing emboldens fascists who increasingly realize you pose no threat to them.

[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 hours ago

Sure, but if the only "working together" is to just whine "I don't like this", that's not really worth the effort is it?

Strength for the people is only really useful when it's used to act.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I agree, but they should be active days, to get people plugged in, motivated, and should not be confused with general strike especially since a bunch of people already mistake general strikes as “boycotting work.” But everything I read says that’s a mistake, because those people end up scabs since they were allowed to think it was another paid holiday.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe local labor unions (who broadly supported the general strike) and community organizations know more about the situation and appropriate response there than either of us 🤷‍♂️

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 2 points 6 hours ago

Yeah those old heads are the ones whose stuff I’ve been reading. But general strike vets are not the ones spinning up these 1-day strikes AFAIK. Feel free to share though.

Most I’ve seen are college students sharing motivational posters Grok made them for the 1-day general strike they wanted to have the Friday before spring break. They’re hyper localized and largely meaningless campus-level social events, not adding stable nodes to the resistance network. (But I’m sure there are others more mindful than that.)

My complaint is simply that my peers don’t try harder to understand the fucking assignment, or ask the experienced, before they Leroy Jenkins.

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago

Can you point to more than a single instance where when a controversy ended a presidency?

It was already normalized.

[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 12 hours ago

Surely another protest and a strongly worded letter will set him right.

People over there should skip the "maybe he'll blame me as a terrorist" fear, he's doing that anyway, and just jump right to the action of clean-up. French-style.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

The only way to stop it from normalizing is by stopping it from happening. People can't negate the normalizing process by sheer will.

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Resist and unsubscribe, if everyone did what they could, might be more effective.

[–] Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world -1 points 14 hours ago

Also, go tax exempt.

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus -2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

people keep saying that. "this isn't normal". yes it is fucking normal. you're just privileged enough you never noticed those in power treating people like this before now. well, now the popular vote just happened to be someone who cares as little for white liberals as he does for minorities. this is what life has always been like for us. time to buckle up and put on your big boy trousers, because if the civil rights movement taught POC anything, it's that shit don't get better without violence.

"this isn't normal" my ass. lol. lmao even.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

What's not normal is that this guy doesn't pretend to care about the people he gets killed. It's fairly normal otherwise, but there is an aesthetic difference, and since America is full of aesthetes the difference seems very large indeed.

In other words, we're in the "so rude, no lube" era.

Nowhere is this made more apparent than in Schumer's statement about the war. He is basically saying "I would've gotten on board with bombing Iran, but you have to shmooze me first!".