this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
30 points (94.1% liked)

Privacy

4366 readers
6 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/25882429

scarily... They don't need to to be this creepy, but even I'm a tad baffled by this.

Yesterday me and a few friends were at a pub quiz, of course no phones allowed, so none were used.

It came down to a tie break question of my team and another. "What is the run time of the Lord of the Rings: Fellowship of the ring" according to IMDb.

We answered and went about our day. Today my friend from my team messaged me - top post on his "today feed" is an article published 23 hours ago.....

Forgive the pointless red circle.... I didnt take the screenshot.

My friend isn't a privacy conscience person by any means, but he didnt open IMDb or google anything to do with the franchise and hasn't for many months prior. I'm aware its most likely an incredible coincidence, but when stuff like this happens I can easily understand why many people are convinced everyone's doom brick is listening to them....

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is the power of data collection. This can be explained without mic's listening in, not that I think they aren't.

400 phones were all located in a bar at the same time, and a significant percentage of them googled 'LOTR run time' simultaneously. All 400 phones are now associated with a likely interest in LOTR movie. It's that simple.

Individual interaction with future LOTR test prompts confirms this association for their account and so on...

It is creepy how much data miners know about us whether we like it or not.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -1 points 10 months ago

of course no phones allowed, so none were used

[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 10 months ago

There were teams, hence a bunch of phones within metres of each other, for an extended period of time.
"They" are fully aware of this, many times over. All it takes now is a single person in that cluster to google the topic. And now all those phones, however so briefly 'related', are smothered with the result.

[–] Fetus@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Why do you think phones aren't listening? All of my anecdotal evidence leads me to believe that they absolutely will, depending on the apps installed.

I've been using LineageOS and GrapheneOS for maybe 8 years or so, and never have any social media / google apps installed, as well as ad / tracker blocking.

My friends, family, co-workers etc. are often served ads for very specific things immediately after we were talking about them. Toys, tools, kitchen equipment, even flights to countries or cities that were being discussed. All far too specific to be coincidence.

So while the phone itself may not be listening, apps can, depending on permissions etc.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 10 months ago

Why do you think phones aren't listening?

So while the phone itself may not be listening

Probably the same thing that makes you think they aren't. There's no evidence to suggest otherwise. My phone has an indicator for when the microphone is accessed, and it's never come on without good reason. I suppose it's possible the OS could be accessing it without tripping the indicator, but that's why you should use an open source OS.

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

So while the phone itself may not be listening, apps can, depending on permissions etc.

Yep. That's the best of my knowledge, today.

I haven't seen any evidence that the operating system, itself, is listening.

But we know that many free, and even some paid subscription apps (check out the permissions on Paramount Plus!) are watching the screen or listening to the microphone.

We know these apps sell the data they collect to absolutely everyone.

There's every reason to believe that collected screen, microphone (and possibly camera?) data then gets correlated with location data collected directly by Google.

Source: I'm a Cybersecurity professional who knows waaay too much about the state of what is possible, and why.

The why is mainly just Google and Meta using their influence for evil.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Makes me reconsider installing LineageOS on my phones

[–] Neptr@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you have a supported device, GrapheneOS is the better choice because it supports relocking the bootloader with a signed ROM. This is integral to the Android security model. I don't have anything against LineageOS, just not something I recommend anyone daily drive because of the security risk.

Definitely don't install /e/OS or IodéOS because they are substantially worse for security.

Here is a comparison of Android ROMs: https://eylenburg.github.io/android_comparison.htm

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Just not a fan of Pixels hardware wise

[–] Neptr@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Understandable. I wish there was a secure alternative to GrapheneOS on non-pixel hardware.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

My Google News has my Lemmy comments in it so I know the Pixel keyboard is leaking. Like I'll reply to someone about a bench top power supply and there will be ads for them in my Google News.

[–] criitz@reddthat.com 3 points 10 months ago

Coincidence