this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
39 points (97.6% liked)

People Twitter

8755 readers
1001 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] clearedtoland@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Bye@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are at least 9

Pluto is a dwarf planet. Planet. You wouldn’t say that a dwarf person isn’t a person.

[–] BrerChicken@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You wouldn't call a person a dwarf, period. So don't do that. If you ever meet a little person, they'll probably refer to themselves as a little person. You should just follow their lead

A dwarf planet is not a category of planets. It is a category of sub-planetary objects. This is how the term "dwarf planet" was adopted by the IAU in 2006. It did used to mean "type of planet", but there are just too many of them, and they're really too different from planets, so it literally does not mean that anymore. At least to astronomers.

[–] Bye@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whatever a red car is still a car.

It’s dumb to say it isn’t a planet just because it hasn’t yet cleared its orbit. The decision to make it “not a planet” was also made by astronomers, not by planetary scientists. Like people with “Star” in their name know more about planets than people with “planet” in theirs.

Anyways it’s extra silly because if you have “real planets” and “dwarf planets” then what is the higher group containing those two? “Things that orbit the sun”? No, they should both be planets.

[–] BrerChicken@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not going to argue with astronomers about how they define planets. I do my job, they do theirs!

[–] Vigge93@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ITT: People misinterpreting the idea as "facts that your school taught wrong", when it's really saying, "things that have changed since you went to school" (either through a change in definition or by new research).

E.g. If you went to school before the early 2000's, you were taught that Pluto is a planet, while that is no longer true since it was recategorized in 2006.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Actually, this is a really really amazing idea.

Set country as an option, and private/public school (different lies...)

It'd be great to let us all face our biases ^_^

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hard to call it a bias when that was the accepted convention for a large portion of the population.

Can’t really blame someone for being taught something than never having it come up again.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah like the food pyramid. That's not my bias, that was the government fucking up

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sentient_Modem@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I ended up making a site that will let people submit facts. They will be fact checked by my till I have the filtering completed. Please check it out and let me know what yall think. It was made to be extensible

whatthefacts.info.

[–] Skyhighatrist@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

The Y2K issue was real, but a lot of people spent a lot of effort to fix it before it became a problem. The dire warnings were exaggerated, it was never going to end the world, but the problem really did exist and it really could have led to some pretty serious issues especially with financial institutions.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›