this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2026
178 points (98.9% liked)

politics

30937 readers
2137 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

This clown said the deployment was "not nearly long enough"

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Spoken like someone who's truly been on the decks or in the trenches.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Spoken like someone who, despite several (alleged) attempts on his life, still doesn't fear the population one bit.

Perhaps that should change.

[–] man_wtfhappenedtoyou@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I wish one of these generals always standing behind him would just take out their service weapon and do us all a favor.

[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

And go down in history as the one who stopped pedo Hitler

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Biden had a chance during the debate.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But did you hear, I heard Trump, in a show of solidarity, is going to spend two weeks as a grunt on the USS Abraham Lincoln! Yes, he is going to go and eat the same rations as them, and do all the normal 5:30 AM - 10 PM work, and it's going to be great because it will prove to all the haters that Trump really cares about service members and is truly one of them who would never shirk service! Yep, that's what I heard!

And if everyone on social media repeats that very real news, then in the very unlikely chance that is untrue, the White House will have to clarify that he has no intention whatsoever of setting foot on the USS Abraham Lincoln because he couldn't last five minutes living in the abject conditions he's imposing on service members! Boy, that would be strange, though, considering he's definitely going to do it. So we should all spread the word!

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Hey! I heard that as well (just now, from you, but that counts). Spread it around!

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

...Cao's statement said.

He also pointed blame at the media for its coverage of the USS Abraham Lincoln, saying outlets " are trying to paint our warriors as victims. Not only is that dishonest, but it takes away the focus on the enemy and the threat it poses against our nation, people, and way of life."

Which enemy? Trump? Because I have yet to see any evidence that Iran would have been a threat to our nation, people, or our way of life if President Pedo hadn't just left Obama's deal in place.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah, but that deal was put into place while Obama was being black, so....

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Great job, "Commander in Chief"

Total failure of the entire upper command structure

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If given the chance, the overwhelming majority of those sailors would happily vote for a third Trump term.

[–] Neocorporation@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Given how placid the average democratic is, I'm pretty confident they will be given the chance.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Could you imagine him coming out and saying that he messed up, that it caused suffering, that he was going to fix it and not let it ever happen again? Holy crap, I think I just blew my own mind.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"Trump ignores the suffering his behavior causes because he doesn't give a fuck about anyone but himself."

Trump is every nightmare we've ever had about the wealthy, all rolled into one person.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Predictable. He cares about no one but himself. Zero empathy. Just like all billionaires.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

“Suckers and losers”

[–] TomMasz@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Shocking(ly predictable). What a vile excuse for a human

So are all the spineless pieces of shit in leadership position who are “just following orders” to mentally torture their own people.

[–] dummyboymc23@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He's not even pretending to give a fuck is he

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Never has. News coverage is all fucked up. More than usual.

[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I guess the one positive thing about this is that his stupidity is really pushing the military towards a coup against his administration.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Most military people I've met support him...so I dunno.

[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Depending on your neck of the woods, I guess. I’ve read about 50% are starting to hate him.

[–] Einskjaldi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I'm sure an election on that ship now would be against.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I'd love to believe that's true… :(

[–] spacegoat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The reality is that most military members are lazy and stupid, no different from the rest of Americans

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 6 points 1 week ago

He uses people. You're not any different.

[–] aldhissla@piefed.world 2 points 1 week ago

Hey, look here, admiral general Aladeen Bonespurs has an oPiNiOn.

I mean the Navy publicly stated that the conditions are normal. This is just his they normally treat their workers.

What are they going to do, form a union?

They're poor people. Why would he care?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Doesn't affect donnie J, so we all good!

[–] soratoyuki@piefed.zip -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Seriously, do any of you care either?

Broken clocks are right twice a day. We don't have a draft; they all signed up to be there, unlike the Iranian school girls they're bombing. Not sure why the former get more sympathy than the latter.

Edit: this isn't rhetorical, can someone downvoting this tell me why I should give a fuck that volunteer war criminals are going hungry? Maybe if conditions are bad enough and they all realize they're abandoned cannon fodder for the Epstein class, enlistments will drop and we can do 1% less imperialism next time Trump needs a distraction.