this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
13 points (100.0% liked)

solarpunk memes

4977 readers
109 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skydivekingair@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

“Look at that, proof that stagnant wages cause more productivity”

  • Our bosses
[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It's time for productivity to go down.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

spoiler: productivity is cheating on wages with CEO wages

"our company is making tons of profit, it must be because of the CEO, let's give him more money"

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

At least productivity has house prices to hang out with

[–] moistclump@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What happened 1979? Reagan?

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago

1979 was Jimmy Carter, a Democrat. Reagan did not start until 1980, and while he is famous for breaking the backs of unions, thus crippling their ability to fight back against this trend, he did not actually start it.

Before Carter was Ford and Nixon, both Republicans. Ford pardoned Nixon's crimes, supposedly to help "heal the nation".

According to Robert Reich's "Inequality for All" (free link) - he was the Secretary of Labor under Clinton and previously served under both the Carter and Ford administration so he was very much attuned to what was going on - this trend started due to the rise of corporations, which have super-rights that humans do not have. e.g., taxes on stock dividends were capped at like 13% while payroll taxes can go up to >35%, and while if a human commits a crime they would go to jail, but not so with a corporation. It's a great racket scheme for the rich to cover themselves in a legal fiction so as to avoid pretty much any responsibility for their actions. Hence why we see so many corporations acting so very boldly to destroy the planet - after all, why not? What's the worst that could happen to them in return?

[–] jelloeater85@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Sanity_in_Moderation@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They don't actually answer that question. It's like they're building to a huge reveal, and then it just stops. Unless I missed it completely.

Edit. Never mind. It's just a bitcoin pump. What a waste.