Technology

Indie games like Stardew Valley and Undertale don't need generative AI, skill issue much?

What next, it's "irresponsible" to mention the system requirements because people won't buy games that are too advanced for their device, which is depriving devs of sales?

Maybe being anti-consumer isn't the best strategy to bring those "consumer" things to your marketplace, Tim.

What really is irresponsible is using amalgamations of stolen work and presenting it as the future

Super strong “If I told you who I really was you’d never have slept with me!” energy.

It’s called consent. If people wouldn’t want to engage with the content unless they were misled in some way then that amounts to manipulation and a violation of trust. Looks like Epic Games just told the whole world that they would lie to their customers if they felt like the truth would give them too much choice.

Fuck ‘em.

He's got it all wrong. We don't want to kill the game, in my case, I just want to kill HIM.

Tim Sweeney with a garbage take, seems like a normal day.

Tim Swine-ny can you just stfu for once?

Sugar labels on food didn't stop their sales 🤷

I don't see it. Disclosure is always a good thing.

Some people care, and they should have the option to choose. Not be misled, ignored, or lied to.

If the game isn't made by people, I wish it a very merry get fucked and die.

"Oh no, informing people allows them to decide for themselves, we can't have that! I, sweeney whiney, must protect the world from informed decisions!"

• Tim Sweeney, wearing is burger king cardboard crown screaming in front of his mirror alone.

So they can't not use AI because they'll lose out to studios that do (not sure about that one but whatever) but if they do use AI no one will buy the game.

Pick one

It's really irresponsible for Tim Sweeney to be a such a fucking moron but he hasn't stopped that yet.

Boo hoo

Stfu sweeney

Fuck you Tim Sweeney. Valve is right for putting that info up so people can make informed purchases.

Transparency so customers can make informed decisions is “irresponsible”? What a garbage take.

If using AI is a “scarlet letter” that makes people hate your game then don’t use it?! The willful ignorance to customer preference is staggering.

That dickhead wouldn't understand responsibility if it tattooed a scarlet R onto his chest.

And this, Tim, is why I spend most of my money at Steam.

This may shock you, but proudly parading that you want to fuck over consumers at every opportunity is not good incentive.

The more I read about Epic Games and their CEO Tim Sweeney, the more I dislike the company and the guy.

Nobody loves you Epic Games, fuck off.

Also Sweeney "why do people like Steam more than the Epic store?"

The best thing about Tim Sweeney is that he consistently has the most wrong take on any issue. He's like the Lou Gehrig of being an idiot.

It is irresponsible to post such shit from the sweeney son of a bitch

no its not

Bitch-boy CEO whining about rival company that epitomizes everything he doesn’t have at every chance he gets, very typical behaviour just carry on

"We must do X at any cost to the user because others will do it and get the money"

This mentality has driven the games industry to become psychologically manipulative, subscription battleass and absolutely proprietary.

Maybe the irresponsibility is in ourselves for giving those game companies money.

Interesting that he frames LLMs as both a tool that he needs to use to compete, whilst also framing their use as a scarlet letter that will tank sales if he uses them.

What kind of looney tunes universe does this motherfucker think he lives in

I'm making a game and I just ai for parts of the code and and for assets currently. I make it because I'm 43 and been programming my entire life and yet never took the time to make a game.

If I ever were to release it on any store, I'd replace the assets with human made and declare that I've had LLM assistance in coding, no matter if there's a role about it or not.

Basically I know it's important to some people and I don't want them to accidentally spend money on something they hate. It would be like sneaking meat into a vegetarian dish.

I wonder why the man who makes money off engine royalties might have a problem with something that can dramatically affect sales after stuffing that engine with the crap people hate.

Tim Sweeney, the pedophile (protector) who insists that pedophiles aren't using Roblox to commit pedophilic crimes by preying on minors? That Tim Sweeney?

Man, Sweeney's been on a roll lately, hasn't he? Too bad I've got no idea what he's talking about most of the time

If I am buying an "AI" game I'll pay a couple of bucks and no more as there are no labour costs involved. If I'm buying from a company that supports human beings, I'll pay about 50-100 bucks, depending on the game.

All of this together is why there is so much media attack on Steam. Just think of the amount of fuckery we would be subjected to, if Steam was out of the equation.

"Think of the game-devs needing to make money" says a fat cat talking about a tool forged from game-dev's labour without compensation and disregarding any social contracts (i.e. copyleft software licenses).