this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
1230 points (99.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

15987 readers
289 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
1230
Thoughts? (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by fireweed@lemmy.world to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
 

Image description:


Text: Amazon's electric cargo bikes have arrived in DC.

Image: A four-wheeled vehicle that appears to be a cross between a bicycle, a go-cart, and a mini-truck

Response text from high t alpha shemale @gluetaster: that's not a cargo bike man that's a loopholemobile


Edit: I found a slightly higher-quality version of the image:

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How to test if it's actually a bicycle:

I propose a simple ontological test by law enforcement. Simply steal one. If the police treat it like they do bicycle theft, it's a bicycle. If the police treat it like it's an auto theft, then it's an automobile.

If the police take the theft of one of these seriously, like they would a car theft, then point to that as justification for why they should be regulated like autos and banned from bike lanes. If the police treat it like bike theft....well....there's a lot of valuable materials in those loopholemobiles....and the police clearly aren't taking theft of them seriously...so....well the problem will solve itself.

[–] crypt0cler1c@infosec.pub 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

That's kind of a dumb test. If I make a bicycle out of gold and diamonds and someone steals it, the theft will be taken seriously. Police just respond to crimes of different dollar amounts differently. It has nothing to do with the nature of this vehicle.

Edit. I haven't seen any more details on these vehicles, but it's clearly labeled a vehicle. I'm guessing it's registered and would be treated as an automobile theft.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That isn't really true. Police have a unique disdain for everything related to bicycling and cycling. Most cops are themselves morbidly obese, ideologically avoid exercise, and view bicyclists as hippies and fitness freaks who deserve to be run over. Police will go out of their way to not bring charges in the case of actual cyclists deaths. And they treat bicycle theft with active disdain, putting far fewer resources into bike theft than the value of the goods stolen would justify.

[–] crypt0cler1c@infosec.pub 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Is this satire? I can't tell it seems like you're serious but definitely reads as satire. Good luck.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kablez@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

Ahh, a western Took Took!

Electric truck.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Looks like a useful vehicle. Whatever else people decide to call it is their problem, not the driver's.

[–] parlaptie@feddit.org 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

It's a problem of where this thing is allowed to drive. It's pretty huge for a bike lane.

Oh and it's also a problem of whether the you need a licence to drive it.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago

Weight, width and speed. That's all you have to look at. Just make lane wide enough.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

You think it "looks useful" to replace the accelerator with ersatz pedals? The only sense it is useful is to work around legislation that was originally attempting to prevent this kind of thing.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 4 days ago

On one hand it's fucking great for the environment.

On the other hand they're only doing this to avoid bare minimum requirements for drivers such as valid motor vehicle licenses and providing working A/C.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

the fucking bike helmet

[–] YimbyEarth@mas.to 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

@fireweed
No pedals, so it's not an e-bike IMO.

[–] ahltorp@mastodon.nu 1 points 4 days ago

@YimbyEarth @fireweed I don’t love how there has been a semantic shift so that mopeds stopped having to have pedals a long time ago, and now even ”bikes” don’t have to.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

I did see a real electric cargo bike, it was not only DIY-ed from a broken mountain bike and a broken kid's bike, but also from a discarded electric roller that one could rent.

[–] KulunkelBoom@lemmus.org 4 points 6 days ago

I used to sell snow cones out of something similar when I was a teenager.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (5 children)

The "Deutsche Post" uses bicycles to deliver the mail. I see nothing wrong with an e-bike to deliver parcels.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›