this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
428 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

85602 readers
3691 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RedditRefugee69420@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Tons of clawing at each other's throats in the comments here, largely declaring one another retarded for their use or misuse of AUR or thanking their lucky stars that none of their packages are on the list (so far), but not much that's helpful for those less fortunate. Maybe nobody's saying anything to that end because the article already covered it, but this is the second out of two times I've visited cybersecuritynews.com and been stuck in an "Are you a bot?" loop that never ends no matter how much of my browser's safeguards I peel off.

Here's what steps I did so far, based on following the links I found in this thread (especially the GitHub comments under one of the links):

  1. pacman -Qm in console yielded a list of all the AUR packages that are installed on the system

  2. CTRL+F the results one-by-one in the apparent most up-to-date list: https://md.archlinux.org/s/SxbqukK6IA

  3. I have one on that list, specifically wine-nine, so I ran bat --style header,snip,changes /var/log/pacman.log | grep wine-nine which yielded the following (at the bottom of a very long list of apparent updates I've run since installing the OS):

[2026-06-05T20:37:06-0400] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] wine-nine 0.10-1

[2026-06-07T21:50:58-0400] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] wine-nine 0.10-1

[2026-06-08T20:56:54-0400] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] wine-nine 0.10-1

[2026-06-09T21:38:44-0400] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] wine-nine 0.10-1

[2026-06-10T21:58:52-0400] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] wine-nine 0.10-1

[2026-06-12T20:18:37-0400] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] wine-nine 0.10-1

[2026-06-12T20:18:37-0400] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] wine-nine 0.10-1

(Like a good little Arch user I've been updating pretty frequently)

  1. Now what?

I saw something that said "check for suspicious processes running as root" but I have no idea what that would look like.

I saw something that said I need to redo all of my passwords and tokens. Any way to check if that's necessary or should I just assume I've been pwn3d?


In using pacseek I think I've discovered wine-nine hasn't been modified in the AUR since "2024-12-07 - 15:18:31 (UTC)" so can I relax a bit? I'm currently going through my list of AUR packages and deciding whether or not I need them as badly as I originally thought. Sadly my distro is one of those that decided to lean on AUR, because most of my list (apart from two) I don't recognize as something I've installed myself.


pacseek would not let me remove the following AUR packages (which thankfully are not in the list (yet)):

:: removing electron41-bin breaks dependency 'electron41' required by deltachat-desktop - an encrypted chat application I installed (not via AUR) I suppose I could find an alternative for

:: removing electron41-bin breaks dependency 'electron41' required by freetube - a YouTube frontend I installed (not via AUR) I suppose I could find an alternative for

:: removing libsoup breaks dependency 'libsoup' required by webkit2gtk - no idea what webkit2gtk is


I only just now realized that chaotic-aur is probably just as problematic as AUR, both in my decision to use packages at all as well as my searching the list of compromise packages, yes? I have tons more packages under that, most of which I think came with the OS.

[–] Crozekiel@piefed.zip 1 points 5 days ago

Chaotic is not just as problematic, thankfully. They have systems in place to flag suspicious changes for human review before letting them out and it has, so far, prevented them from shipping any compromised updates.

I thankfully hadn't updated anything from the AUR for a couple of months (it doesn't happen by default when I update the rest of my system) and was unaffected, and after looking at the list of things I had from the AUR, I didn't need any of them... So I now have zero AUR packages on either of my systems.

Yeah I had a mild panic before realising that I haven't actually used aur for anything yet

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 84 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hope all the Arch based distros will do a proper post to inform their users on how to cleanup afterwards.

I'm hoping at least cachyos, the distro I use, will tell me exactly how to check and clean my system.

I remember that when I installed a few of my AUR package, I was well aware that this repo was pretty much unregulated and that I just have to trust it's safe. So I made sure to only use AUR as a last resort. But there was warnings on cachyos that were displayed to tell me to be cautious about it so that's at least a positive.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 81 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

The article has instructions to do exactly that.

Users who regularly install AUR packages should take the following steps immediately:

Run pacman -Qm to list all foreign (AUR) packages installed on your system and cross-reference against the published list of compromised packages

Audit recent PKGBUILD history for any packages installed between June 10–12, 2026

Rotate all credentials — browser passwords, SSH keys, API tokens, and cloud access keys — if any flagged package was installed

Scan for suspicious processes masquerading as kernel threads using tools like rkhunter or chkrootkit

Consider using AUR helpers with PKGBUILD review prompts enabled by default.

The Checklist of infected packages

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (12 children)

Ok, but I was expecting something a bit more automated then opening a list of package in kate and comparing it to my list of installed AUR package... Plus it's 400 package so that's a lot of things to check and plenty of space to miss one package by manually checking.

But I get it I'm lazy and just need to script something myself. This is affecting so many people I thought we would have a script to check quickly if you are "infected".

Edit : thanks for the numerous script sent as reply ! But I'm all set now, thanks !

[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 34 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It took Arch ~19 years just to get archinstall.

Something tells me there won't be a script.

[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 13 points 1 week ago

The link is a script

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

A lot of those 19 years were times where only nerds used arch.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

CachyOS community seems to have a detection script, I have not vetted this run at your own discretion.

https://discuss.cachyos.org/t/aur-compromised-400-packages-affected-20260611/31040

[–] 0x0@infosec.pub 7 points 1 week ago

You could probably find it on aur lmao

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (7 children)

how many aur packages do you have? Most people i know have like AT MOST 20 or so packages from the aur. Which takes less then 2 mins to manually check against the list.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] gemakey@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Holy shit it's like all of Python.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, Python has been a massive vulnerability for a long while. And the AUR has similar issues. This is only getting widespread coverage now. But it's always been a risk.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] misterrabbit@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Been saying for years that people need to stop treating the AUR like a repo, when it's more akin to curl installscript.sh | bash.

[–] goatinspace@feddit.org 13 points 1 week ago

Some packages pull files from personal dropbox...

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

So, better to use a safe language, and use

curl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -sSf https://sh.rustup.rs/ | sh
  • right??

(I copied that from https://rust-lang.org/tools/install/ just a second ago....)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But it is a repo. It's just an unofficial one. I don't know how you use it without understanding this. It's not far from perfect, but it is useful.

[–] gergolippai@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

the problem is exactly the fact that it is a repo; it introduces a layer of unknown between the dev and the user. and the user will unavoidably "trust" it (especially when it's listed amongst official repos in e.g. the graphical version of Pamac), without understanding the risks.

[–] lazylemons@lemmy.today 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have always been nervous about this type of thing happening with the AUR. Thankfully many packages I used to need the AUR for have since added native versions or made flatpaks. I hope AUR users don't have too many issues from this!

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

flatpaks arn't any safer and with how poor the sandbox is handled by 99% of devs. Hell flatpaks have a new issue every other month. Its almost more often to see a new flatpak problem then aur problem.

Its literally no safer in reality sure on paper its safer but reality has proven that flatpaks just are not some magical fix to this problem.

Hell half the time when flatpaks do have issues they go unaddressed or fixed for months after they are found. While AUR problems get smacked real fucking fast after they are found.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Cease@mander.xyz 14 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I think a lot of people are confusing what the AUR actually IS. It is NOT the official package repository used by Archlinux - it's more like a bunch of community install scripts for stuff that isn't officially supported yet - for popularity or other reasons.

So for all those people complaining and saying "debian does it better" it's very likely that you would not even HAVE a package to install and would have to come up with a build script on your own - the AUR allows you to skip this and instead just verify that the script itself isn't malicious, which is usually fairly obvious.

A lot of people here seem to be under the impression that all of this effort should be abstracted for them - but that's what you chose when you left windows - a system that you control intimately with a necessitation to actually do some upkeep yourself because a giant company isn't doing it for you.

In other words. RTFM and stop expecting other people fix all your problems for you, because that's exactly how windows got to how it currently is.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

it’s more like a bunch of community install scripts for stuff that isn’t officially supported yet - for popularity or other reasons.

I'm looking at the list of affected packages and many of them are in official debian repos. Isn't the issue then that the official Arch repositories don't have many packages and people have to use less secure sources? That still sounds like an Arch issue to me.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Lord743@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[–] KssioAug@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I was starting to get too confident in AUR. Thankfully I wasn't affected. Just replaced all possible AUR packages to their respective Arch and Flatpak alternatives, with exception of very few or from the ones I had no option. But will definitely check before updating them, and will only install AUR packages as a last resort.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] xploit@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Welp if nothing else at least this has helped me to replace jack1 with jack2 (out of my 4 total Aur packages)

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not even having npm installed as a system package feels like a personal win right now. I'd like to think I would have caught this due to the number of dependencies it would introduce to my system. node_modules seems like it's been the source of most of the recent CVEs I'm hearing about.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] malloc@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Is this the first time AUR has been compromised to this degree?

Given how changes are often unvetted, I am surprised this hasn’t occurred before.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›