this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
16 points (83.3% liked)

thebirdspapaya_snark

382 readers
20 users here now

Where to find mobile apps

Hello new Lemmy friends!

Word on the street tells us our community is regularly making it the all page. While this is very cool news to hear, we can see how the sudden emergence of our posts in your feed might feel jarring and probably raises some questions. And also how, without knowing the backstory, our community might appear less than virtuous, so here’s a very brief introduction which hopefully will clear a few things up.

The woman we’re discussing is a body positive influencer and media personality who has gained fame and wealth by lying, manipulating, exploiting her children for content, plagiarizing BIPOC creators and blaming her BIPOC content editor for it (thereby ruining her career), among other things. Her fraudulent behavior is no different (I’d argue worse) from the likes of Jay Shetty (google him if you don’t know who he is or what he did). She’s the latest in a long line of grifting influencers who are abusing their power, taking advantage of their position and exploiting their followers. The difference is that she’s Canadian. Our laws around social media and advertising aren’t as clear (and where they are she’s disobeyed them), add to that, our mainstream media has protected her from those who’ve tried to expose her grift and silenced/intimidated anyone who’s tried to speak out.

Our Reddit sub was taken down due to reports of copyright infringement, which is unfounded and categorically untrue as no one ever tried to steal her work and pass it off as their own. The mods have made an appeal. While at first glance it may seem like we’re just “shitting on her” the sub has been more devoted to investigation and posting proof of her lies than just bitching for the sake of bitching. The reality is that she’s hurt, manipulated and let down a lot of people. She stole intellectual property and employment, caused mental distress and has repeatedly told lies to boost engagement and profit off her audience, so people are understandably upset that their voices are being silenced.

We’re grateful to have been welcomed so kindly by so many of you, and to those sticking around to watch the drama unfold, we’re glad to have you!

**all posts are alleged.

Rules:

-Please follow Lemmy content guidelines. See https://lemmy.ca/

-Minor's Right to Privacy: No posts about the children whatsoever. No mention of full names and no photos. Minors must be completely removed from all photos/videos. No exceptions. This goes for ANY child. No just TBP's.

-No snarking on the character or appearance of any of the children. This is a site dedicated to Sarah Landry.

-No posting information that is not readily available online/NoDoxxing: Influencers post an abundance of personal information online. Examples of doxxing include:

-Comments Regarding Mental Health: Jokes or Snide remarks about mental health or unaliving oneself will not be tolerated under any circumstances. No armchair diagnosing.

-Do not post or solicit communication with TBP or related influencers: This includes screenshots and references to 'this is what I commented.' Please message a mod if you would like to share anything anonymously.

-No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, body shaming or other ism/bigotry.

-No TBP crusaders

-No commenting with the sole purpose of being rude/insulting: while criticism/debate is welcome on the page, being purposefully mean, insulting and rude is not.

-No brigading/incitement of mass harassment. Do not post links to affiliate sites, or incite members of the sub to brigade against TBP/related parties (this includes brands).

-Fact check and do your homework: Make sure to research before posting. If you are posting photos or videos that are filtered/photoshopped, make sure it is blatantly obvious. No rumours. no speculations (example Ozempic use).

-No overly vulgar language.

-No advertisement of any kind

-No duplicate posts

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MoonChild@lemmy.ca 25 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Was she afraid her young friends were going to steal her purse?

[–] Selfabsorbedbarbie@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 weeks ago

Hiding body. Confident queen. Forehead dent and all

[–] Poofluencers@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 weeks ago

She is so awkward! Never truly at ease or comfortable in her skin.

[–] facialSwelling@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

hahaha probably! She doesn't trust LGBTQ+, AND sheesh her face looks different! Looking like Nana K here.

[–] Richbynameonly@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 weeks ago

Do these legs look like the same legs she posted on her story yesterday?! Be so for real 🤣

[–] crownofgold6@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Can’t help but wonder if these people really like her or if she shows up and they’re eying each other like “ugh she’s here?” Lol

[–] MoonChild@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I like to think they can see through her fake facade and don’t like her but have to tolerate her since she’s friends with another one of their friends. I also like to think they see her as someone who’s trying to attach herself to them for her own gain and get followers from their community since she knows her own is built on bots and could be wiped out with one click.

[–] ThatOrangeBird@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 weeks ago

I suspect every last one of them is either already an influencer of some sort or wants to be, so it's doubtful they have these thoughts at all.

[–] Idontbelonghere@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 weeks ago

Agreed! I think they've never run in the same circles before, so they're trying to be welcoming, but it's all transactional on her end. I hope they see through it quickly.

[–] Mostlycivil@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Those shorts definitely don’t look as loose as they were in her look at me picture!

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 weeks ago

Those are shorts? They look like denim granny panties.

[–] MoonChild@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Her voice in this is nails on a chalkboard and she’s talking about a hair band. No one cares.

[–] Uterusofsteel@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Omg it was HORRIBLE. it sounds like bad acting. That's not her voice. It's like wannabe valley girl but she has a Canadian accent so it will never work!

[–] MoonChild@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Do you think she’s trying to talk like the younger women she met on the patio in TO or has she been watching a show she’s imitating? It just sounds ridiculous coming out of her mouth.

[–] Uterusofsteel@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 weeks ago

A combination of both I believe. Definitely got worse after hanging out with the youngins though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] crownofgold6@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 weeks ago

She babbles on about the most mundane things, like who cares about this????

She’s so boring. Then she spent ages reposting about foods that don’t exist anymore. Her content sucks.

[–] Poofluencers@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

She’s feeling herself today that’s for sure. I wonder how she feels when she sees herself with the filter off?!

[–] MoonChild@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 weeks ago

She is! Must have had a nice evening with her ‘friend’.

[–] ThatOrangeBird@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

The audacity posting this. She does NOT look like a 21 year old fresh-faced ingenue. She doesn't even look young for her age, which makes this even more ridiculous. What is she fucking thinking? It's outrageous and beyond delusional. It seems she tends to go harder on the filters when she's around younger women. Just wow. It's likely she looks much closer to the mocked up image that shows what she might look like on the right. The side by side makes the deceit very clear.

[–] facialSwelling@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Your mocked-up version looks like the real Sarah Nicole Landry. Her face is always changing in impossible ways. Fucking fraud.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Adavison@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 weeks ago

You can tell when it’s not her week with the kids. She just sits and does nothing. She books all her work when they are home so she can avoid them.

[–] facialSwelling@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 weeks ago (26 children)

In March 2026, the CRA announced crackdowns on influencers and is very focused on mega influencers. Here is a summary:

New Mandatory Platform Reporting Rules: Digital and social platforms operating in Canada are now legally required to send user income data directly to the CRA. The agency no longer relies on self-reporting; it already has the data before you even file your return.

AI-Driven Audit Matching: The CRA has deployed advanced machine learning and AI-powered data-matching tools. These systems automatically flag discrepancies between a creator's reported income and their actual digital footprint, cross-referencing brand campaigns, affiliate links, and online storefronts.

Social Media Scouring: Audit teams utilize open-source intelligence to explicitly audit public profiles. If a creator's tax return claims low income, but their Instagram or TikTok feed features high-end promotional vehicles, luxury clothing, or luxury vacations, the automated risk-scoring system triggers a formal manual review.

The Core Targets of the Audits. The CRA’s primary focus is on capturing unreported, non-monetary value and missed sales taxes.

The "Gifts as Cash" Rule: The CRA treats free PR packages, gifted clothing, electronics, skincare, hotel stays, and flights as taxable business income. Creators are being heavily audited for failing to declare the Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) of these items. 😀

[–] mapper@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 weeks ago

best news ive heard in a while tbh

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] HippoBloat@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

Guess who has a volvo in the laneway

[–] Richbynameonly@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 weeks ago

I fucking despise her

[–] dapperdashmarzipan739@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 weeks ago

Me but I pay for mine 😤

[–] crownofgold6@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 weeks ago

What a joke. Sick of her getting everything she wants handed to her all the time. All she has to do is mention something and here it comes for free. She doesn’t deserve a single thing she gets, she isn’t even a good influencer!!!!!

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] facialSwelling@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Richbynameonly@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

The Reitmans one always sends me 🤣🤣🤣

[–] facialSwelling@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 weeks ago

It's my absolute favourite; it's the real Sarah Nicole Landry 😆

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MoonChild@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 weeks ago

Traitors won a Canadian Screen Actors Guild award. Why isn’t Birdie taking all the credit for the win?

[–] MoonChild@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 weeks ago

I am a woman in this demographic and would NEVER use the word elderly as an identifier. I don’t know if these comments are real or if the commenters are just batshit crazy. I would also never be throwing flowers at this one’s feet for taking and posting pictures of her body, talking about all her insecurities and foisting it on other women and pretending to be the saviour of women everywhere.

[–] FraudulentFruit1@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago (13 children)

When you just can’t let someone have their day!

[–] Lisamarie@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Always has to be about 🐦💩! She’s such an insufferable jerk! 🙄

[–] MoonChild@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago

It’s always all Sarah, all the time!

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] facialSwelling@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 weeks ago (26 children)

idea and images from Birds Snark on Reddit

[–] Frequent_staff@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 weeks ago

I can’t unsee this now. LOL

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] MoonChild@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I think she’s looking a little rough these days and she was, clearly, holding her breath in this pic

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›