wildly extreme
Uhhh. I mean. They're not wrong per se... 😅
He's advocating murdering pregnant women; wildly extreme doesnt quite seem to cover it
this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
488 points (99.0% liked)
politics
30319 readers
2460 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
It's "wildly extreme" in the same way that the East India Company "cared about profit"
Per se
Interesting, I don't know that I've ever seen it typed before! Thank you! ☺️
Is it cool if we stop posting shit from Newsweek?
Yes, the bill is real, but I almost completely disregarded this as ragebait, which it likely still is on OPs part.
Newsweek is not news, it is a notoriously inaccurate tabloid.
The only moral abortion is the one that they perform
So "pro life" they'll kill you over it.
We're going to MURDER PREGNANT WOMEN to Save Unborn Babies!
-Republicans LITERALLY!
Seems like getting surgically sterilized is an actual form of self-defense. I'm sure they'll make up some bullshit excuse to try and stop that too, but point stands.
Text of the bill:
Subject to approval by a majority of voters during the 2026 general election, adds new Section 39 to Article I of the North Carolina Constitution as follows. Specifies that human life begins at fertilization. Recognizes a new human life as an individual person, entitled to the protection of the laws of this State from the moment of fertilization until the moment of natural death. Holds persons willfully seeking to destroy the life of another, at any stage of life, or who succeeds in doing so, accountable for first-degree murder, or attempted murder. Specifies that any person has the right to defend the life of themselves or another, even by use of deadly force if necessary, from willful destruction by another person. Specifies that the State has an interest and a duty to defend innocent persons from willful destruction of their lives and to punish those who take the lives of persons, born or unborn, who have not committed any crime punishable by death. If approved, effective January 1, 2027.
Holds persons willfully seeking to destroy the life of another, at any stage of life, or who succeeds in doing so, accountable for first-degree murder, or attempted murder.
That's the part where I see them giving leeway to dumbfucks to just got shoot up abortion clinics. Its not really about killing the women (through they'd let that go by too) its about killing the doctors.
*Edit: its also about killing the mom who takes her raped daughter across state lines to get an abortion elsewhere
Oh, I hadn't considered trying to take out the docs (my initial read was focused on the mothers). That's an especially bad feel.
I think NC Republicans are willfully trying to destroy their own citizens, especially women.
What idiotic wording. So if I see some asshole shooting a woman who they believe is having an abortion, I guess I can then legally kill him too since “any person has the right to defend the life of themselves or another, even by use of deadly force if necessary, from willful destruction by another person.”
Oh no, then someone can kill me for the same reason.. and so on.
Well, North Carolina has some beautiful scenes. I wouldn't mind moving in and taking the place over if they daisy chained this law into wiping themselves out completely.
How about a bill urging deadly force for rapists? Deadly force for congressional insider trading? Deadly force for using deadly force without an act of congress? Deadly force for fraud? Deadly force for accepting "gifts" while in office? Deadly force for ignoring congressional subpoenas? Deadly force for using the justice dept to harass rape victims? Deadly force for using office to make billions? Deadly force for hiring your own kids and placing them in office?
How about lethal force to protect women who are seeking out medical services from places such as Planned Parenthood? These anti-choice motherfuckers need to fuck all the way off.
load more comments
(3 replies)
The only psycho backing this bill is Keith Kidwell who represents the tiny coastal district 79.
Let's kill the mothers, that'll save the children.
Makes perfect sense.
I asked the "Ask Conservatives" subreddit if they thought murdering a doctor about yo perform an abortion would be a just killing. I guess I have my answer.
use deady force on a woman to stop an abortion
Do... Eh. Do these people understand how life works, and that ending the mothers life would surely stop the abortion, but also kill the fetus? Like, do I need to explain this?
Talking about throwing out the baby with the bathwater
You remember how they were looking up taking braindead women and using their bodies as human incubators? Seems kinda related
They do understand killing the mother kills the fetus too right?
Understanding is too big of a word for MAGA.
I hope that every moderate politician across the state loudly proclaims this is obvious evidence that the GOP's core value is not protecting life but punishing "promiscuous" women who dare to have sex for any reason other than procreation.
This is the same party that is lamenting the country's birth rate, by the way. They aren't even pretending to care about women any more.
So isn't that also an abortion?
Those democrats and their “branding” JFC
Witnessing literally (what should be) lethal levels of irony.