this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
401 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

84796 readers
4657 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 26 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

They should make a separate mailing list specifically for people who use AI, to concatenate their results and boil it down to something manageable for a human to review.

It's like having a porch light a few feet away from the door to attract all the moths so they don't come inside whenever you open the door.

[–] nightlily@leminal.space 13 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Why do you think the kind of obnoxious cunt who uses an LLM to spam a Linux mailing list would voluntarily use another? AI-bros, as a rule, do not respect others.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

Maybe use idea from PGP/GPG which is web of trust where people are added based on others vouching for them.

To make it somewhat available others can join as well but for a fee and at the lowest level. The fee would be determined on amount of cunts.

If somebody would not follow rules they would be marked as not trusted but money wouldn't be refunded they would have to pay again.

The money could be used as donations to fund the project.

If there's somebody who couldn't afford those fees, they could still find someone who could vouch for them and bypass it.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe force it some way, I don't know. Find a backend software solution. Figure a way to programmatically identify when AI was used and automatically route it somewhere else? Or force them to fill out a dropdown menu saying whether AI was used or not?

You're telling me the Linux Foundation can't engineer a viable software solution?

[–] nightlily@leminal.space 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

If it were that easy, we wouldn’t be in this situation. Education wouldn’t be under attack, social media wouldn’t be flooded with bots. LLM detection is incredibly unreliable and anyone saying they’ve cracked it is selling snake oil. There are techniques for image diffusion that are holding up currently but text is another story.

Checking a checkbox again relies on these chucklefucks being honest and decent and respectful people which they fundamentally aren’t.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

They should make a separate mailing list specifically for people who use AI, to concatenate their results and boil it down to something manageable for a human to review.

I get it - like an AI summary!

[–] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

It's easy, we create a problem with AI, and the best solution is to use even more AI, and when everyone is dependant on it to manage digital infrastructure that used to function for decades, then we raise the price.

[–] AntY@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe they could use an LLM to make a summary of the results!

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 6 points 17 hours ago

Ideally, If the AI was truly any good at finding the bugs, a well trained AI could give it the ole wheat and chaff action.

we're not there yet.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz -1 points 15 hours ago

More like use a deterministic program to concatenate all the deltas, merge redundant ones, and present any conflicts to a human to rectify. Then a human can give it a final review before finalizing anything.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

they should make another mailing list for ai generated reports that they totally read, and ban anyone who submits slop to the main one. not sure how feasible it is since spammers will just generate new emails, but at least they would have something clear to point out the malicious intent.

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It would likely create more work and just result in two unmanageable mailing lists. Doubling the problem.

Sounds like the perfect solution!

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

the point being the mail list for ai slop is there just so it doesnt clog the actual one and anyone who breaks that can be blacklisted as malicious actor.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This ai shit is fucking everything up for everyone.

[–] AuginTuga34@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

I hate it with a passion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm just imagining a bunch of sweaties telling people they work for Linux as a cybersec expert, burning through $300 of tokens a day.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

For which they haven't yet paid a single penny, because AI corpos need people to get addicted to their products.

[–] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We truly are witnessing the death of open source in real time. Thanks AI!

[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

Let's not being over-drammic here. They just need a better way to filter off AI junk request. They should be the one to do it? No, it suck. Is it fair? Not at all. Still this is what things are now.

Btw. People using Linux should remember that just because " it's free" doesn't mean it don't cost money and resources to keep going. So:

DO YOUR PART AND DONATE TO YOUR DISTRO DEVELOPERS.

https://www.linuxfoundation.org/about/donate

https://www.debian.org/donations

https://www.linuxmint.com/donors.php

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

I read that Linux Foundation spend only 3% on the Linux kernel. Where the rest go? Well one of their biggest spending is AI.

[–] DevDave@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

indeed! The open source community should adopt LLM powered mailing list filters. Basically new age version of "protection money" as you pay AI firms to stop other AI firms from drowning your organization.

Joking aside, the dead Internet theory is unfortunately looking pretty accurate.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 21 hours ago

LLM powered mailing list filters.

Deep Seek and other locally hosted options should be up to this task...

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Faceman2K23@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Why does everyone always use the old photos of chubby Linus?

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 33 points 1 day ago

Because they have to nerf him somehow, can't just have worlds sexiest kernel developer getting everyone soaking wet all the time.

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He looks so friendly and approachable in that picture

[–] DevDave@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

kinda like an anglerfish in that you are lured into a false sense of security which makes the straight to the jugular scathing responses even more effective.

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

Naaahhh, he's not like that... I never met him but he can't be like that; I mean look at him.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 20 hours ago

Damn, I had no clue he looks like that now. He could be a captain on Starship Enterprise.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›