this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
38 points (73.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

39637 readers
1330 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

west west bad big bad very bad stalin good lenin good ignore starvation ignore deaths ignore everything just read state and revolution bro

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Because social media is where nuance goes to die - and that applies to both MLs and us.

A lot of them overcorrect from falling for capitalist propaganda into falling for USSR propaganda

For example, about North Korea. Claims about it are probably exaggerated to some degree, but I sincerely doubt it's secretly the success story at least one ML I had the displeasure of talking to seems to believe it to be.

The truth is nuanced. Nuance is hard. Blaming everything on the West is easy.

On the other hand, MLs themselves are also more nuanced than we often give them credit.

Unfortunately, like nuance, communication is also hard. Especially in hot-headed situations like this.

[–] napkin2020@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Because they somehow didn't outgrow the cringe iamverysmart and iamverydifferent phase of young adulthood. Probably because they are well off and never had a struggle in their life which makes them such a bore.

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 1 points 5 hours ago

iamverydifferent isnt that cringe tbh, and iamverysmart kinda is, because theres no one in the world that knows everything

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 68 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Tankies gonna tank. And those two instances constitute two thirds of the tankie triad.

"US bad, so every enemy of US must be good"

Basically it's a lot of that, plus a bunch of authoritarian and contrarian bootlickers who think they're leftists.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

yep - it's a cult

[–] ivan@piefed.social 31 points 1 day ago

They have this quasi-religious cult vibe that makes them like this:

  1. Sacred texts that give answers to everything.
  2. Saints and prophets. I mean - they mostly identify themselves by someone else's name - e.g. stalinists, trotskyists, maoists etc.
  3. Aggression to outsiders. Building a good sect requires that, it's how you keep folks inside - just make them hate the outside.

That's not a scientific conclusion on my part, rather vibe-based one, and some conspiracy theory communities can also be described in that way. Which also leads to next conclusion - they're kept in by a sense of community, and since that community is built around fringe and often cringe ideas - it only leads to doubling down on ideas that seem stupid or dangerous or simply not thought through to any sensible person.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

It seems to me like they take the wrong lesson from leftism, which is that the US is usually the bad guy in most situations and they represent oligarchy interests by default, then extrapolate that to other countries opposed to the US being the good guys by default. Nuance and taking the facts at face value for every situation is much harder to explain to others as an ideology.

They've also been infected with a cynicism that makes them open to grifts similar to the right. Our best fighters can't be perfect, so they try and rip support off of them. Jimmy Dore, the Aussie green party, Jackson Hinkel, the Caleb sex pest dude, they all have criticism of everyone else while providing no real ideas of their own and how to get there. They're just propped up as a distraction rather than a movement.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think the defense of Stalin comes at the end of a particular path that can be very appealing to people for various reasons.

One potential driver of it is that ML/Stalinist groups are not too dissimilar from a secular religion; it has a group of people ready to welcome you as a friend and ally as long as you agree to a certain worldview and a very specific reading of history from approved texts that always pose historical Maxrist-Leninists as righteous figures who didn't really do anything that bad, and if they did, it was for the greater good, and justified.

Those texts can even make a certain amount of sense if you're disillusioned with the status quo, and distrust western media. It's also likely extremely comforting to believe that while the western world is fucked up and exploitative, there are at the same time powerful allies elsewhere in the form of the AES states, which in their view are making steady progress towards the promised socialist utopia.

So ML groups can offer a feeling of belonging, friendship, a comforting worldview, and the belief that if we just follow the directions of long dead prophet-like historical figures (like Lenin or Stalin), then we will someday have heaven on earth. These are extremely appealing aspects to someone who may be very lonely, or who may have suffered a severe trauma and may not have their basic needs met (which may also be what leads to some people being attracted to the MAGA cult)

To someone well versed in history and a desire to find multiple viewpoints for a historical event to avoid propaganda bubbles, the true nature of ML/Stalinism and its authoritarianism becomes self-evident. But for those who never went down that path and are in a vulnerable state, a 'scientific' cult offering you hope, meaning, and companionship is very easy to fall into, and thus willingly self-delude themselves to attain in-group status.

Just like with normal religions/cults, once they are deep inside it, they are heavily encouraged by the in-group to suspect any outside information that challenges their narratives or isn't approved by the group, and thus the cognitive dissonance they could create if looked at more objectively can mostly be avoided.

Also similar to religions; a ML member is strongly encouraged not to have doubts about the validity of the approved sources/texts/history. If doubts are voiced, the group will attempt to re-affirm the validity of the texts (keep the faith). But if that fails and the member continues to voice doubts, they are likely to be ejected from the group, which is very traumatic for most people, but especially so if there is no other support groups to lean on. This likely results in many keeping doubts to themselves, or convincing themselves those doubts are just CIA lies, similar to how Christians try to reject their own doubts with the concept of Satan spreading lies to tempt a Christian from their faith through logic or archeology.

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

wrong analogy doubts r good they make you research Christianity and dive deeper into faith

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Wasn't how it worked for me. I had doubts, and seeing atheists in debates with Christians unable to answer those doubts at all adequately only strengthened those doubts until I looked into it enough to realize it was all BS.

Most people leave cults because of doubts. Why would a cultist ever leave if they still fully believe the teachings?

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

can you tell me one of the questions they were asked?

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

it was over a decade ago that I watched those debates, most of which were with Christopher Hitchens, though which ones specifically I wouldn't be able to say besides this one, which stands out in memory since it had both Hitchens and Stephen Fry arguing against religion. I also recall watching a lot of 'Hitchslap' videos which were snippets of Hitchens giving quick-witted responses to religious arguments.

For context, the doubts I had as a teenager were:

What could God possibly be achieving by giving children cancer and dying slowly and horrificly?

If those children all go to heaven, why not kill all children at birth to ensure they don't go to hell?

What's the point of this whole game, anyway? Why create this planetary diorama to fill it with people just to see if they believe in a capricious God that doesn't answer prayers and seemingly makes itself as difficult to believe in as possible? Why has Jesus/God never spoken to me directly, like so many other people claim to be able to do? Why did God allow thousands of other religions throughout the world and various points of time, each one claiming they alone are the true path to Heaven, how does one pick the correct needle of salvation in a haystack of religions? The only reason I was my specific flavor of Christian was because it's what my parents believed, what research did they do before choosing this one specifically (virtually none, just vibes).

When I looked to the Bible for answers, I was struck by how awful God was to Job, killing his entire family and giving him unhealing sores, all to win a bet with Satan. God's response to Job asking why the fuck this was being done to him was to basically say "Don't fucking question me, Job, look at how powerful I am boy, look, I can control leviathan or some shit!", which was astonishing to read, as it made God seem like a child ranting at Job for being rightfully upset at him, and with no reasonable answer for all the suffering, just a hand wave from God. Needless to say that didn't help bolster my belief.

At the end it was simply too much that didn't make sense, too much doubt in the foundations of the whole thing, too many failures of religion to make any impact whatsoever when I prayed.

The debates with Hitchens touched on at least some of those doubts, which made me realize all those doubts weren't from the devil, they were well founded and others shared them. At that point I'd finally had enough and said fuck the whole thing.

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

1 It takes immense wisdom to understand God's plan for yourselves, so, it is almost impossible to understand God's plan for the world.

2 Heaven depends on Faith in Christ and the fact that He died for your sin, not age. And they are still born with Original Sin.

3 Frater, God will always speak to you, but not in the ways you expect. It will be subtle, not a voice in your head. You need to listen and notice. And God answers your prayers, if they align with his will. Lies will always exist, it is your duty to see through them.

4 What denomination were you?

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 43 minutes ago)

Ah, I didn't realize you yourself were religious. I thought you were just curious how doubt could lead to leaving a cult. I understand now why you think it wasn't an apt comparison with ML.

  1. If God is real and has a plan, at this point I would argue that God is very much not equipped to be God, and contrary to the concept of being all-knowing, is very clearly making things up as He goes. I think Job is a good example of that, since God seems to realize that he actually fucked up pretty bad when Job rightly questions why his family was killed and why he had to suffer so arbitrarily despite believing in God fully, and God basically doesn't have an answer besides "Cause I'm powerful, bro. Look at all these giant beasts I control". Job's challenge seemed to shake God up pretty good, and make him decide to see what it was actually like to be one of the Humans he fucked with so much, so he decides to make Jesus so he can experience human mortality, which gives him a whole new appreciation for how messed up he'd been before, causing him to turn over a new leaf, being way less brutal and far more caring instead of, ya know, letting his followers dash babies against rocks like in the old testament (which leads into our next point).

  2. That means every single baby and child not old enough to understand the concept of faith or Jesus went straight to hell, an unspeakably evil act {or, depending on your denomination, purgatory I guess).

  3. Many religious people have claimed to have literal conversations with Jesus or God as part of their 1 on 1 relationship, are you saying they are lying or suffer from delusions? God's Will is an explanation to cope with the fact that praying is as good as a random coin flip; if the thing you prayed for happens, hurry! God answered your prayer! If it doesn't, guess it just wasn't his will, tough luck sport.

  4. Generic Protestantism that promoted belief in the Trinity. Why do you ask?

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

How about Western , chinese amd russian imperialism is bad?

[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All of lemmy is a gradual progression to the left. Starts at the average liberal and stretches all way down to them. Then because Republicans/right wing people don't exist here they get to call liberals nazis. Someone always has to be a nazi and someone always has to be a good guy. They think they are the good guys.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

I have conversed all the time onthe platforms and with users without it coming upt.

[–] EyIchFragDochNur@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Dumb kids, mentally challenged and weak ones who are fooling themselves. But mainly mentally challenged I guess. They hate everyone who doesn't lick their spiritual leaders' boots. They need a Führer like Nazis because they can't think and they hate just like Nazis.

This doesn't make capitalism good but they just don't get it