this post was submitted on 13 May 2026
101 points (97.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

39637 readers
1330 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I’m not trying to troll, I’m genuinely curious. Thinking about deer specifically, it doesn’t seem like visual camouflage would really help much when hunting them. Deer sense predators by sensitive hearing (big ears) and smell (long snout). Their eyes are on the sides of their head, so they detect motion rather than high-resolution.

So trying to blend in with the surroundings doesn’t seem to be an advantage in this case. Assuming all this, what’s the point of clothing with camo print on it?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 60 points 6 days ago (10 children)

For deer camo is irrelevant because most cases you have to wear hunter orange (or pink) because you don’t want to die by being shot by another hunter. Also the deer don’t really notice the orange so it works out. If you strictly hunt deer you should focus on staying warm and wear hunter orange, camo doesn’t matter.

For waterfowl and Turkey especially though camo is necessary. Birds are really good at seeing danger so if you don’t blend in you have almost no chance of getting one.

The reason a deer hunter would likely be wearing camo is they also hunt turkey/waterfowl and gear isn’t free so they use a lot of the same gear for both seasons.

At least this is why I wear camo while hunting, I do both, but I’m fully aware it doesn’t matter for the deer. The gear is just good for long duration outdoor activity in all weather.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 14 points 6 days ago (3 children)

so like when hunting fowl you just take the danger of getting shot?

[–] grammaticerror@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Not OP, but yeah, basically. Lots of incidents of hunters getting shot while turkey hunting.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 8 points 6 days ago (3 children)

ok. so I guess its just that the wounds are less severe since its buckshot or whatever but deershot will like be bad enough you want the orange?

[–] too_high_for_this@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Birdshot. Buckshot is for deer, never heard it called deer shot.

Buckshot is about 10 lead balls, each one roughly the size of a 9mm bullet. It'll absolutely fuck you up.

Slugs are more common, though. That's just a single 1+ oz projectile. Will also ruin your day.

Birdshot is hundreds of pellets, ranging from .05" - .18" diameter. They lose energy quick, so if you're 50+ yards away, they might not even break skin.

There's dove hunts where hunters completely surround a field and send their dogs in to scare up the birds. They're constantly getting hit by other hunters' shots from the other side of the field but nobody gets hurt.

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Birshot shot needs a fair bit more distance than that to not break the skin in my experience, even for 20 gauge.

I wish I had not witnessed these things to know for sure...

[–] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

One thing I've never understood is after you shoot a bird with a spray of fine pellets, what the hell is left?

Seems like you'd just have a wet pile of meat that is torn the fuck up. I'm guessing you can't eat it because it's full of those little lead shot; not that you coudll't pick 'em all out, but what a pain in the ass. You can't mount it because it's now just a shredded mess, you may as well just buy a picture of whatever you shot and hang that up.

So what's the point? Just to delete birds?

Only if you hit it from 3 feet away. The point is that the pellets spread out and a couple hit the bird. Hopefully you hit something vital enough to kill it or you injure it enough that it can’t fly and the dog retrieves it.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

yeah my use of terms is generally pretty random with only a hint of possible relation to the real ones. in my head I thought buckshot was the weak one so my brain made up deershot.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah, buck is another word for male deer, hence the name. So it is "deershot" but not that word.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 5 days ago

this is a mind blown instance for me. completely aware a buck is a male deer and never made the connection to buckshot. Well. That will certainly make it easier to remember.

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

With deer you’re typically using ammo such as a .308 or .243 Winchester. These are long range high velocity rounds that have very high lethality.

The long range part is important, a hunter 200 yards away wearing camo is probably mostly invisible and a hunter taking a shot at a deer at 200 or even 300 yards isn’t uncommon with this type of ammunition.

Shotgun shells have lots of small balls, they will often be concentrated more by a choke when people hunt birds, but their effective range and velocity combined with not being a solid mass make them way less dangerous the farther from the shooter they get.

This also means nobody is taking shots over long distances so the chances of noticing a hunter in camo is higher overall.

That said people do definitely get hit while wearing camo as was said above, it’s a risk, but if you know where you are and know your fellow hunters aren’t doing unsafe things those risks can be mitigated.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Only when you’re hunting with Dick Cheney.

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 days ago

When deer hunting you're firing a big ass heavy bullet that can travel and be lethal for a long ways.

Birds are hunted with small pellets that dissipate energy a lot more quickly.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I have family who hunt deer. They almost all wear camo I think (with hunter orange), but none hunt anything else I don't think. I think there's two other reasons for it. One is because everyone else is doing it, so they think they need to.

The other is that hunting gear is likely to be made in camo anyway, because it's versitile. Sure, none of the clothing needs to be marketed as "hunter clothing" (besides the orange), but a lot of people will shop and not question if they should buy a non-hunter alternative instead. They just follow the marketing.

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago

You can get hunting gear that’s not camo but yes there is a lot that is.

If someone doesn’t think about it the camo will serve them better in the long run if they do decide to hunt other things so it works out.

[–] InternationalHermit@lemmy.today 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yeah, if you want hunting gear, pretty sure camo is your only color choice. Kind like HenryFord with his any color as long as it’s black. I am not a hunter so what do I know.

but the other day I was looking for a long sleeve summer shirt to wear on walks/jogging this summer (I hate sunscreen), and ended up with a shirt for fishing. Every lightweight loose fitting long sleeve synthetic shirt was advertised as fishing gear. I guess I am a wannabe fisherman now.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hunt in whaterever I'm OK with getting dirty but I always have a blaze orange hat because someone shot at me when I was a teenager.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 2 points 5 days ago

I'm honestly shocked at how many people will seemingly fire at something without confirming their target first, going by all these stories. Like there's really that many dummies that will just send a round at something that might be moving in the distance?! Sheesh!

[–] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 days ago (4 children)

There is definitely a fashion aspect to camo. Less so in hunting, and more so in the military world. Relevant fashion podcast:

https://www.articlesofinterest.co/podcast/episode/39c00bac/gear-chapter-5

The rare times I have been hunting we wore blaze orange hats & vests with no camo at all. Not getting shot by accident was priority #1, avoiding hypothermia was priority #2.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago

I do just about everything I can to minimize me disturbing the area. So breaking up the contour, hiding my face (eyes and faces looking at you mean predators), and try to match camo to where I live and when I hunt. Not just for deer but also the birds, squirrels, etc because if they are acting scared they might alert a deer or at least put them on edge.

Also it might I can see wild life a little more naturally then if I was just screaming "human here!" Visually, audibly or through smell.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Well, camo can be effective for people in forests. There was this paintball player who got run over by a car because he was well camo'ed...

[–] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

People already covered a few reasons deer hunters wear camo (only wanting one set of hunting clothes, camo does work on deer to an extent, etc). I'll add a couple of other reasons.

Many hunting seasons overlap, so someone might head out early on a Saturday morning to their hunting area to hunt for deer then spend the heat of the day hunting birds. Or maybe they have a license for both bear and deer, and they'll take what they see.

Second, camo works on humans. Non-hunters absolutely love to mess with hunters. I have several stories of waking up hours before dawn, driving to a place I can hunt, sitting in a tree stand in the freezing cold waiting for dawn, and then having a random person spot me from the road, then hike up to me to tell me I'm not allowed to be there cause Mr X doesnt let people hunt on his property (despite the fact that I have a signed permission note from Mr X). Or someone who doesn't think hunting should be allowed spotting me and then just letting their dogs off leash through the woods to flush away any deer, despite the fact that if I had a dog with me while hunting, it would be illegal because of how stressing it is for deer to be chased by dogs. Or the DNR officer doing their job by checking to make sure I have permission, the proper licenses, weaponry, square inches of pure blaze orange, etc, and next thing you know, you've lost 1 of the 2 days you'll be able to hunt that season. You only have a few prime hours per day, and having a person show up during that time will keep deer away for the rest of that window.

It's far easier to just hide from people.

Edit: and another thing I just remembered to add, camo lets other people know you are likely a hunter. If you are just walking the woods with shorts, a t-shirt, and a weapon, you will likely freak some people out.

[–] backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If you are just walking the woods with shorts, a t-shirt, and a weapon, you will likely freak some people out.

Results may vary depending on what state you’re in. I’m in Idaho, and while I no longer hunt, if I’m going backcountry I carry as a last resort if my bear spray won’t cut it or in case of survival emergency. But I admit, if I was in the Foothills north of town I’d probably be a bit perplexed at some rando hiker with a rifle, though not surprised.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkSirrush@piefed.ca 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

As someone who lives in northern BC: only city folk/wannabe hunter cosplayers bother with camo. Sweats and sunglasses work fine.

I know several people that dont even leave their truck to shoot unless they actually need to.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

My dad lives in the sticks and always makes fun of hunters with their fancy multicam outfits and $1000 scopes since he frequently gets entire families of deer at his doorstep. He jokes he could take one out with a .22

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I know several people that dont even leave their truck to shoot unless they actually need to.

in the US that's illegal.

[–] DarkSirrush@piefed.ca 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Well, I'm not in the US, and even if it is illegal here in Canada, there are so many back roads and abandoned forestry trails you would have to either be incredibly unlucky or an idiot to get caught.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

just pointing it out so dumbasses in the US won't go, "that's a great idea!"

[–] clif@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, the smart ones do it from a road at night with a spotlight... no camo required there either.

... I honestly can't decide if I should tag this with an /s or not because it is 100% a thing that happens (also 100% illegal, especially when off-season, no license, and you throw in the case of natty ice, but when has that stopped a determined redneck)

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I have run across so many "hunters" doing exactly this so many times in my youth while backroading.

you're absolutely right. the only thing that can stop a determined redneck is a lack of "ambition" (beer or ammo).

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

It's not always to actually shoot the deer, when you see hunters at night using spotlights to, well, spot deer. We used to do it when I was 18 as well. It was more to find and designate feeding places for the deer and then plan shooting spots based on that.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It's all about stimuli. I'm sure most hunters have sat for hours without seeing a thing only to absent-mindedly stumble on a deer while noisily walking or riding back home. Deer might react to a stimulus, but they won't react to nothing... obviously right? I've had deer snap their heads straight to me because of a slight movement I made. While others have just kept an eye on me while they continued whatever they were doing. The point is to give them as little to react to as possible while actively trying to hunt.

Another aspect is that's simply what is available. I've got nice warm camo bibs because they are made with soft quiet fabric. My buddy who ice fishes has warm bibs as well that are not camo but noisy as hell because fishermen don't need to worry about noise. There's almost no options for warm and quiet clothing that isn't camo.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›