this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
700 points (96.8% liked)

Selfhosted

59314 readers
208 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] little_tuptup@sh.itjust.works 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Projects like Plex, they started out from the open source community, had free contributions, and then monetized. People are bastardizing open source.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 4 points 6 days ago (6 children)

The reason Plex is as popular as it is is because of their infrastructure and software that lets users stream video and music remotely on any device at the press of a button. That costs money to build and maintain.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It certainly doesn't cost what they're charging. They have a cache, a relay and an auth service. I'll grant them some more allowance for an active security team. They've wasted manyears on features nobody wants and have eliminated any feature that costs them any amount of money to maintain if they can't make money off it. (sync, client serve, yada yada)

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It certainly doesn’t cost what they’re charging.

That's how services and products work. If they sold their product at cost, they'd go bankrupt. They're actually charging peanuts for the service they provide.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

Their entire infrastructure required to do that proxy and caching is at most 10k a month. Thats a couple thousand users.

What you're actually paying for is their research and development of all that add ridden content they're trying to shove down your throat. Then selling your data, and selling you and your watchers ads.

That's some really expensive peanuts you're suggesting

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I have a Jellyfin server as backup, but its clients are shit for anything that uses subtitles. I bought plex pass years back for $80 on sale, can't complain, but I'm never going to wholly rely on something closed source that requires online credentials.

[–] kalpol@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Never had any subtitle trouble on Roku or shield

[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

That's great if you have a Roku or Shield. I don't. I've owned both in the past and don't want either because they're both an absolute mess of advertising. I currently have an Apple TV and an Android tablet. Jellyfin is okay on Android (and I emphasize okay and not amazing or great), but the Apple TV is may main viewing device and Swiftfin is the best option and still miles behind Plex.

Particularly because on Apple TV with Plex you can override built in subs with the closed caption styles, meaning literally all subs that aren't explicitly burned into the image can be made consistent and easy to read. Haven't seen that feature anywhere else, including on the Shield TV/Pro (I used to own one, got rid of it when Android TV updated to the ad-riddled version it is today). It's a really amazing feature IMO to be able to have full control of subtitle font, size, style, color, outline, and spacing, no matter what you're watching.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I can’t comment on Plex vs JellyFin, but it’s an interesting perspective that $3/mon for remote access is too much

I use another piece of opensource software, where I consider that a plus. It takes the headache and security issues off my hands, while I can support the developers with a small contribution for an optional feature

[–] KatherinaReichelt@feddit.org 3 points 5 days ago

$3/mon is $36 a year. That adds up - most people have to work several hours to earn that money.

[–] kalpol@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Plex may also be harvesting your data. When I used it years ago it was already trying to send logs back home, blocked by the firewall.

[–] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Plex may also be harvesting your data.

You mean to say “Plex is harvesting your data.”

[–] kalpol@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I like to not legally commit myself

load more comments
view more: next ›