this post was submitted on 10 May 2026
241 points (98.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

39487 readers
1677 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the Lord of the Rings fandom there's a persistent debate whether balrogs, or Durin's Bane specifically, have wings. The text in Fellowship is ambiguous whether what it is describing are literal wings or something else wing-like.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZMoney@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

I'm a planetary scientist so technically this is a field, you can also be into meteorites as a hobby.

Chondrule formation. These are spherical balls of formerly molten rock that solidified and clumped together to form chondrites, some of the oldest rocks in the Solar System that predate planet formation. Essentially these are nebular dust grains that formed when the Solar System was still an accretionary disk.

Except, do chondrules predate planet formation? What causes them to melt while they're floating around? How do they overcome the kinetic barriers to agglomeration? Are the terrestrial planets, whose bulk composition is thought to be chondritic, actually composed of chondrites?

If you want to see one of the most simultaneously esoteric and bitter scientific debates, attend a chondrule formation session at a meteorite or planetary science conference. MetSoc is a great one in August, and officially I go to present my work but actually I just love the fireworks. As an achondrite person, I don't touch this topic with a ten foot pole, but I love to watch when someone introduces a new wacky idea (space lightning? Shine from a molten Io? Extrasolar?) and you see 15 eminent greybeards rush the mic to yell their objections.

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

-Guitar picks/strings

-Warhammer editions (Or competitive vs narrative play)

-using linux and the many reasons why

[–] Fribbizz@feddit.org 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Some would argue it misses the topic, but I'll offer the Unix text editor wars. Vi vs. Emacs is pretty much the epitome of a pointless religious war in people's favourite activity, though for some that's obviously their job.

Why do I mention it? Because most would just look at it and say: obviously none of the above, what are you even talking about? But those in the know have been heatedly debating the topic since at least the 80s.. (I'm team vi for what it's worth)

[–] uthredii@programming.dev 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I've never understood this debate, how can you compare an operating system to a text editor?

[–] Fribbizz@feddit.org 1 points 8 hours ago

And then you have the heretics that load up viper in emacs to use vi keybindings =D

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

D&D vs PF2 really brings out the uhh, loudest of each community

[–] gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

True! There was a period where I swore PF was better than 5E but then Draw Steel started posting their early system versions and I realized I was arguing for a couple of degrees of difference when the real improvement was an entirely new way of thinking.

Draw Steel isn't for everyone or every group or especially every genre/playstyle, but I think it should force everyone playing generic fantasy style hero games like 5E and PF and 13th Age, etc to reexamine the lineage of games we've been used to.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

It's a different genre but I also appreciate Call of Cthulhu's mechanics. Roll-under is a bit weird but I appreciate that you're rolling against your own skills rather than some number set by the DM side of things. The DM just has to decide if it's normal, hard, or very hard difficulty.

As far as a complete paradigm shift, Alice Is Missing is a fantastic game. The difficulty lies in finding three other people who can play a serious RPG about a missing child in a small town.

[–] QuantumStorm@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Lancer has been my Draw Steel. That and I love the setting and giant mechs :D

[–] early_riser@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Here's another one: Is there a "blind community?" This may sound odd since the very fact the question exists implies there is, since blind people have to get together and discuss it. So in some ways yes of course there is, but I'm inclined to say no, at least not in the sense that a lot of people define "community".

Blindness does not respect class, creed, or culture, so you have blind people from all over the map ideologically speaking who all approach their blindness in different ways. That's not getting into the difference between low- vs no-vision, or born blind vs blinded later in life, or blind people who are independent vs those that lack access to proper training. I've run into blind people who don't like hanging out with other blind people IRL because the spectrum ranges from "can't even pick yourself up when you trip without help" to "flies around the country alone with no problem."

I think the question exists because we look at deaf people who unambiguously have cultures and languages unique to them when we don't really have that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago

I've gotten quite into doing pub karaoke for the past three years. It started as me going to monthly nights at my local, then following that particular KJ after they cancelled future gigs with her, to befriending and following a few other hosts.

There's three particular debates:

  • Who produces the best karaoke backing tracks? There are a lot of websites/platforms that produce licensed karaoke tracks, such as Karaoke Version, Sing To The World, Sunfly, Karafun, Mr Entertainer, Zoom Karaoke and a few others. I think some can be more hit-or-miss than others. Karafun are generally good with lyric readability but their app/service is kinda shit if you don't have an internet connection.

  • Should the host get on the mic and sing at all? Some i know are the kind who like the sound of their own voice a bit too much and tend to hog the mic, but there's also one I know who rarely if ever sings himself.

  • As a host, should you play songs between singers. I can understand spacing out singers when it's quiet, but if it's busy and you have a few dozen singers waiting for their turn, you're just gonna piss people off if you play full songs between each act in my opinion.

load more comments
view more: next ›