this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
290 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

84277 readers
3170 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 6 points 1 day ago

Just regulate the social media megacorps, not the access to them. I don't wanna present by papers at every military security checkpoint on my internets.

[–] acido@feddit.it 46 points 2 days ago (1 children)

nothing a social media ban for <13 years old kids can't solve, am I right?

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 39 points 2 days ago (4 children)

There's a reason why Meta is lobbying for age verification. They need it to be compliant with the law, without the accountability that goes with it.

What they need is an absolutely gigantic non-negotiable fine.

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 21 points 2 days ago

I don't think it's just about accountability, I think it's also about being able to charge advertisers more for verified-human eyeballs.

[–] viov@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Multiple non-negotiate fines from multiple different groups in different lawsuits

[–] XLE@piefed.social 8 points 2 days ago

The annoying thing is, meta already knows a bunch of its users are minors, but it refuses to act on that information. It's like they're waiting until they can impose universal surveillance on everyone before it bothers doing anything.

Never mind that many things (like self-harm content on Instagram) should be banned regardless of the viewer's age, and that plenty of this regulation should be left up to parents anyway

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

10% of yearly profit per day of non-compliance.

[–] skribe@piefed.social 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Profit is far too easy to manipulate. A percentage of gross revenue would really sting.

[–] docus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Which is what these EU laws usually do. This one is up to 6% of world wide revenue. Actually collecting those fines is another story though.

Should be easy if they have balls.

"You are no longer able to operate within our borders until the fine is paid and you have resolved the issue".

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 31 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Honestly they're going to push for these age limits and I don't even specifically disagree with some websites being not for under X, but verifying with some company's website and sending them your info sounds awful. I'd much rather use my country's existing id verification and use that to verify my age with the EU's age thing and use that for the websites.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I dont understand why people are even considering staying on those platforms. What are you even doing? Cant live without them? How sad is that actually. And I mean that. It really is very sad that humans now think they need these platforms.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 1 points 1 day ago

I think it's nice to know what my relatives are doing and what's happening in the community around me. That's why I use Facebook. I'd be fine with them knowing my age tbh.

[–] f314@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Exactly! The EU digital wallet spec is perfect for this: It allows for granular info like “is this person older than X years”, which is exactly what we want here! Not what Meta wants, obviously, but fuck them.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They will be fined €10 per year until this is resolved.

/$

[–] notastatist@feddit.org 8 points 2 days ago

Thats like double their taxes in the whole EU! How could you!?

[–] yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

From the linked press release:

For example, when creating an account, minors below 13 can enter a false birth date that makes them at least 13 years old, with no effective controls in place to check the correctness of the self-declared date of birth.

Meta's tool for reporting minors under 13 on the platform is difficult to use and not effective, requiring up to seven clicks just to access the reporting form, which is not automatically pre-filled with the user's information. Even when a minor under 13 is reported for being under the age threshold, there often is no proper follow-up, and the reported minor can simply continue to use the service without any type of check.