this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
922 points (98.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

15598 readers
88 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Can't find it right now, but this reminds me of that one video about the Citroën C15 (or a similar car) basically asking "Do you really need a car bigger than this?" and showing off how the C15 can transport multiple cows and go cross country and such.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I had an suv for most of the 90s.

load more comments (2 replies)

Sell me a Station Wagon with third row seating, or damn-near-anything that seats three in the front row today. You can't.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago
[–] ductTapedWindow@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (6 children)

As a person who lives in upstate New York / the rust belt, this would be catastrophic for traffic in the winter. And actually the CUVs on each side are more fuel efficient, have less emissions, and are significantly safer than the 90s car. Looks can be deceiving.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Lederrucksack@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I first read "Dutch SUV's" and thought aww that's a cute SUV

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

suv's where big in the 90's so I don't get this.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I was hit by a car a few years ago. I actually died and needed CPR to keep my heart going a few times. If it had been an SUV, there'd have been nothing to do. I would have just been gone.

I say that, but, at the same time, I think being tall requires an SUV. Little sedans are too close to the ground, and they're too hard to get out of them. The whole world is designed around someone who is 5'5". Its a struggle to fit into that as someone who is almost a foot taller than that. Getting off of short furniture is difficult on my knees (especially as I'm getting older), so I could only imagine getting out of a sedan that is so close to the ground like the one in the picture. The SUV (even for all its environmental wastes in its usage) is something that a tall person can easily fit into and get in/out of.

It's almost like the world was designed backwards: we need taller furniture (something I use more often than a car) but more efficient cars.

Oh well . . ..

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›