No, she was and is complicit.
this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
72 points (92.9% liked)
news
852 readers
1211 users here now
A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.
Rules:
- Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
- Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
- Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
- Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
- No link shorteners
- No entire article in the post body
founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
Okay, so didn't ask. But thanks anyways for bringing up the Epstein files now that Iran is taking a back seat.
She would only have made this statement if she's been getting questions about it.
But I am glad that she's bringing people's attention back to the Trump-Epstein files.
Remember, people, they are trying to make you focus on the Epstein files just so you forget about the war in Iran!
Covering up the cover-up with the cover-up! This really is 2D chess.
Yo dawg. We heard you like cover-ups, so we covered up your cover-up with a cover-up covering a cover-up.
1D snakes and ladders.
I doubt she was, but that does not mean she was not an Epstein asset
She's still married to her trafficker what does she mean by this?
No one ever thought she was.
Why is she in the feed again? Just because?
I mean, this “don’t mention that i was friends with Epstein” press tour, apparently - why?
They cover this shit in undergraduate psych. I mean, come on…
Hahaha
D e n i a l
Well yeah, there'd be a poorly-spelled e-mail like 'hey don thax for lteting me fuck ur new bich.'
Apparently the world's greatest encryption is being rich.